Quote:
Quote:
never said MOST, said MORE, and all you said is what I was saying, yes it;s about competition, that is why they want it.
Never said women are 4"11, I said some women are, its not unusual.
That is my thought on height. if u dont think so, thk too.
You have an bad habit of assuming your opinions are somehow superior to mine.
Stop correcting me, you may or may not learn something, but it's all personal opinion, every bit of it.
I didn't catch that you where saying it was competition, I took it off as more them showing off than competing. I know I was trying to correct you as well you said some things that weren't totally true when it comes to height. I am not claiming to be a know it all with height but being 6'6" I think I know at least a thing or two on the subject. I am fully aware that things look different for shorter guys. I get reminded of that when ever I am in public. But the reasons why you posting for why girls like/want tall guys is short sighted to say the least.
I could probably write an essay on the whole height thing. But simply put I think to many guys here put to much value in the whole height thing and such hurting themselves in the process. Because they are only feeding the whole girls must go for tall guy thing. When in reality there is no reason for it. Granted society does give tall guys advantages if you will, all I think girls find appealing.
Take some time to educate yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination
Dating and marriage
Heightism is also a factor in dating preferences. For some people, height is a noteworthy factor in sexual attractiveness.
The greater reproductive success of taller men is attested to by studies indicating that taller men are more likely to be married and to have more children, except in societies with severe gender imbalances caused by war.[13][14] However, more recent research has drawn this theory into question, finding no correlation between height and offspring count.[15] Moreover, research on leg length and leg-to-body ratio conflict with the notion that there is a distinct preference for taller mates. A 2008 study found that both extremes, tall and short, reduced attractiveness, and a 2006 study found that a lower leg-to-body ratio in men and higher leg-to-body ratio in women increased aesthetic appeal.[16][17] Biologically, from an evolutionary perspective, these findings are consistent with data relating height to human health. Therefore, a biological or, more specifically, an evolutionary argument for the preference of a taller mate is questionable, lacking definitive evidence.
Nonetheless, on a cultural level in Post-industrial society, a sociological relationship between height and perceived attractiveness exists. This cultural characteristic, while applicable to the modernized world, is not a transcendental human quality.[18] Quantitative studies of woman-for-men personal advertisements have shown strong preference for tall men, with a large percentage indicating that a man significantly below average height was unacceptable.[19] A study produced by the Universities of Groningen and Valencia, has found that men, who felt most anxious about attractive, physically dominant, and socially powerful rivals, were less jealous, the taller they were themselves.[20] The study also found that women were most jealous of others' physical attractiveness, but women of medium height were the least jealous.[21] The report, produced by Dutch and Spanish researchers, stated that because average height women tend to be the most fertile and healthy, they would be less likely to feel threatened by women with those similar features.[22]
Paradoxically, a study has shown that in Britain, short women were the most likely to be married and have children. Some reasons which have been suggested for this situation include the fact that short women start puberty earlier than taller women who experience delayed fertility since they spend more energy growing, and that shorter women have a larger pool of men to choose from if they wish for a taller mate.[22] Dr. Adam Eyre-Walker from the Centre for the Study of Evolution at the University of Sussex, argues that the study was done on British people, and so the choices may actually be a result of the influence of culture.[22]
It is unclear and debated as to the extent to which such preferences are innate or are the function of a society in which height discrimination impacts on socio-economic status. Certainly, much is always made in newspapers and magazines of celebrity couples with a notable height difference, especially where a man is shorter than his wife (for example, Jamie Cullum, 7 inches (18 cm) shorter at 5 ft 4 in (1.63 m) than Sophie Dahl, though the difference is often exaggerated).
CHAT