http://secretseductionblog.wordpress.co ... rual_game/
Highlight of the article:
"Natural Game from what any credible authority in the field has been able to present has been nothing more thans over developed inner game with a few topic suggestions and limiting rationalizations that present it self as being socially minded.
Alright, Alright October, What does NLP have to offer?
Decades of Development in Human Behavioral performances for one.
Before Ross Jeffries Picked up the book Frogs into Princes, Richard Bandler and John Grinder, changed the face of Psychology forever. Inspiring and attracting Personal Power Gurus to First world Governments gleefully glowing about its powerful results.
Open Source Code. Who ever develops a NLP technology the libraries and assets are widely available for review and scrutiny from the orignal source code (NLP Classic Code, NLP New Code and Ericksonian Hypnosis). Even
Speed Seduction can be traced back to the core technologies that Ross has since developed over the last 20 years.
Models that
elegantly handle Subjective processes Objectively. This point ties into the core fundamental flaw in Natural Game. Instead of glossing over Internal experince as simply Vibe, and striping the depth of rapport to kindegarden level. NLP was developed around the core experience and interactions between Internal and External experiences with in human behavior to objectively achieved what prior impossible by the accepted belief that the Subjective was to vague and vast to achieve a intimate understanding per individual in a short amount of time, let alone a 5 min phobia cure.
To the Natural Gamers out there, I ask you this. Can you get a women into bed in 20 mins or less, or Did you walk away with her phone number? Do you have a developed understanding of her subjective experience at the end of a conversation, or are you still stumped where this might go next? In a field of study like pickup this intriguing there is lots to experience and offer, but I call fowl when the very nature of a school of thought that lowers the bar so low that anyone can stumble over to conclude they are getting results, Especially in an area of life where guys vulnerable to accept anything presented at face value."
I just want to see your thoughts on this. Personally, this part of the article right here summarized why I prefer these kind of techniques over so called "natural" game or all this talk about being an "alpha" male.