You've been poisoned by the idea that the PUA community's often very bad tactics lead to more sex.
Do you know why normal guys have sex with only 7 women in their lifetime? Fear, insecurity.
The thing about Sinn, is he gets laid vastly more than almost any other PUA instructor. But there are dozens of them who teach "daygame". I would say a good %1-2 of men have had sex with 100+ women in their lives. I don't think that number is even close to %1 of the PUA community.

The main difference between guys not getting laid and getting laid is not pickup. There are really only a few things that accomplish this. Meet more women, escalate fast on the ones who seem interested. Sinn overcomplicates things.

It took him years to start deprogramming himself from common community knowledge.
A lot of Sinn's products are OLD. Circa 2008. Sinn doesn't really think like this anymore.
Something he said in one of his more recent emails What I am telling you, is you can sleep with over 100 women in your lifetime, without using "daygame".

Most daygame success comes from tourists. Something Sinn casually mentions in his podcast, but *never* mentions in his program. So if you are going to insist on doing daygame, then at least hit up touristy areas. If you're going to Publix to hit on random women, then go to the one near the hotel, not the one in the heart of the suburbs. Are there local tourist attractions? Go hang out there. Your best bet in daygame is out of town or (even better) out of country women.

And when spring break rolls around, get your ass down to a beach where people go for spring break.

_________________
RSDTyler

I was thinking..

If anyone is interested you could live coach me in set.

Via SPAM or phone..

I could have an ear piece and you could listen (and watch if you wanted) the interaction and talk to me while it was happening.

Versalis you seem intelligent

you'd be a good coach

The sheer amount of sets i've been in through tinder, badoo, daygame, nightgame, concert game ect ect ect lead me to believe that I might be actually undateable.

I've tried lowering my standards and gone on dates with asian girls that im not even attracted to, and even they dont want anything to do with me.

You are not subcommunicating much sexual intent in the rl approaches that were posted. You're doing side glances rather than penetrating into their life with eye contact and a romantic connection.

It is almost as though you are tip-toeing the interactions rather than leaning into them.

Moreover, for the last 3 years I would estimate that you have not expected or envisioned or felt you deserved the ideal result at a core level, I could be wrong on this point however.

I believe you said you have never had a girlfriend, yes?
You need to get early experience being around women. You need platonic female friends at your school, and you should get your first girlfriend from school as well.

Like I keep trying to tell you, the way you're going about this is not socially normal, and it's vastly more difficult than how most guys get girlfriends and lays. You are a good looking guy, in good shape. With normal social skills and simply flirting with women you meet, and going for sex, you should probably have a lay count in the double digits. PUA is not helping you here.

You've put 3 years into something that is unlikely to work for someone inexperienced with women. The upside? Once you get some female friends and a girlfriend or two from normal means, you could switch back to daygame and see much better results(though I still don't suggest this).

Understand, I'm not against talking to strange women. I do it too. But only the ones who clearly notice me, as I go about my day to day life. I've had dates, lays and FWBs off of meeting random women. 2 of my 5 LTRs came from this as well(a concert and a coffee shop). But I have literally never gone out to "do daygame".

Unless someone tells me they're putting less than 500 hours into this per year(INCLUDING date time), and getting north of 20 lays from it, I know they're wasting their time vs other methods. I seriously doubt that even 1-50 guys attempting daygame, ever reach an appropriate ROI.

_________________
RSDTyler

He created this thread with the name "straxman"

and then started responding to people with the name "ideist".

Probably a troll. Has multiple accounts and loves to talk about stuff online but never approaches in real life.

He posted infields.

_________________
RSDTyler