Ok so you've disqualifed yourself ... now what?



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Tools & Techniques of Game: Meeting, Attracting and Seducing Women » Approaching and Opening




Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 8:58 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 106
I am having problems with disqualifications.

You approach, open, insert a time constraint and then within 30 seconds you disqualify yourself like Style says you should. You stack some routines, build some rapport and now it's time to exit the frame. You go for the number close and the girl then says, "but you said you're gay/married/involved" or whatever.

For this first stumbling block you can still pretend that you only want her number to keep the conversation going and you have no romantic interest. It might just work and you may number close. But then what?

Two days later you're faced with a situation of having to call this girl again. How do you start setting things up that leads to a date and then to a more romantic involvement given your original disqualification?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:49 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:54 pm
Posts: 17
Well first off, I don't believe you should say you have a girlfriend or married except as a joke and it should be cocky funny.
I personally do not go the gay route.

Disqualifiers should be in the form of negs. Your disqulifying yourself by making fun of her in a way where she does not believe you are hitting on her. A Popular example is " you and I, we would never get along. We are to similar your stubborn and so am I... blah blah." By disqualifying yourself your accomplishing two things.
1. Disarming any obstacles by showing everyone your not a threat
2. Getting the target intrigued by the fact that she thinks your not hitting on her which will make her wonder why.

Hope this helps
Apple


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:53 pm 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:16 am
Posts: 551
Werd, disqualifying yourself by lying is not the way to go. If you've already done this and want to change things, I'd say its not worth it. Learn from it and move on.

_________________
The hottest ginger you'll ever meet.

I don't have an ego, I just love how awesome I am.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:51 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 106
Quote:
Well first off, I don't believe you should say you have a girlfriend or married except as a joke and it should be cocky funny.
I personally do not go the gay route.

Disqualifiers should be in the form of negs. Your disqulifying yourself by making fun of her in a way where she does not believe you are hitting on her. A Popular example is " you and I, we would never get along. We are to similar your stubborn and so am I... blah blah." By disqualifying yourself your accomplishing two things.
1. Disarming any obstacles by showing everyone your not a threat
2. Getting the target intrigued by the fact that she thinks your not hitting on her which will make her wonder why.

Hope this helps
Apple
How can you say you're "too similar" given you've only known her for like 30 seconds (you should use a disqualifier in the first 30 seconds according to Style).


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:52 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 106
Quote:
Werd, disqualifying yourself by lying is not the way to go. If you've already done this and want to change things, I'd say its not worth it. Learn from it and move on.
No, I have not done that. That's what Style says you should do. I just don't know of a good way of doing it and then setting up a date. Cos it doesn't make sense.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:20 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:16 am
Posts: 551
Doesn't make sense to me either. I've never read any PUA books, so I didn't know thats what Style suggested. Maybe someone who is familiar with Style's technique can chime in, because I have no idea why you would do that.

_________________
The hottest ginger you'll ever meet.

I don't have an ego, I just love how awesome I am.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:15 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 106
Quote:
Doesn't make sense to me either. I've never read any PUA books, so I didn't know thats what Style suggested. Maybe someone who is familiar with Style's technique can chime in, because I have no idea why you would do that.
I hope so too. That being gay, already got a gf etc, is all style's material.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:40 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 9:54 pm
Posts: 17
Quote:
Quote:
Well first off, I don't believe you should say you have a girlfriend or married except as a joke and it should be cocky funny.
I personally do not go the gay route.

Disqualifiers should be in the form of negs. Your disqulifying yourself by making fun of her in a way where she does not believe you are hitting on her. A Popular example is " you and I, we would never get along. We are to similar your stubborn and so am I... blah blah." By disqualifying yourself your accomplishing two things.
1. Disarming any obstacles by showing everyone your not a threat
2. Getting the target intrigued by the fact that she thinks your not hitting on her which will make her wonder why.

Hope this helps
Apple
How can you say you're "too similar" given you've only known her for like 30 seconds (you should use a disqualifier in the first 30 seconds according to Style).

That was just an example of a disqualifier. Any sort of neg would work.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:31 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:50 pm
Posts: 8
Quote:
Doesn't make sense to me either. I've never read any PUA books, so I didn't know thats what Style suggested. Maybe someone who is familiar with Style's technique can chime in, because I have no idea why you would do that.
I've only read Style's book "The Game" but basically he makes him seem uninterested, or uneligible. He does this so hes not threatening to anyone, but then he pretends to slowly let his attraction to her grow over time. This makes it seem more organic, so the girl believes that she charmed you into liking her. Like he used the line "If I wasn't gay, youd be so mine" so he seems like a fun, nice guy, but wont hit on her because hes gay.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:35 pm 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 106
Quote:
Quote:
Doesn't make sense to me either. I've never read any PUA books, so I didn't know thats what Style suggested. Maybe someone who is familiar with Style's technique can chime in, because I have no idea why you would do that.
I've only read Style's book "The Game" but basically he makes him seem uninterested, or uneligible. He does this so hes not threatening to anyone, but then he pretends to slowly let his attraction to her grow over time. This makes it seem more organic, so the girl believes that she charmed you into liking her. Like he used the line "If I wasn't gay, youd be so mine" so he seems like a fun, nice guy, but wont hit on her because hes gay.
Ok, I get it now.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:22 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:51 pm
Posts: 22
you could also try throwing in a statement of interest before parting with her to set up the phone call


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 3:56 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 4:56 am
Posts: 67
So in a way, this disqualifier is a form of sarcasm?

Correct me if I'm wrong.

_________________
"Veni, vidi, vici."
"I came, I saw, I conquered"
-Julius Caesar


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:38 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:09 am
Posts: 294
Website: http://you-so-wud.bebo.com
Location: From Ireland, In UNI in Florida!
No the disqualifier is like a back handed compliment. Your basically telling her your not here to pick her up your here to socialize and hang out.

But as the set grows on and you have won her friends over then u show some IOIs because now the attraction is there..


8)

_________________
Don't Hate The Player, Hate the Game...

8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:14 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:09 am
Posts: 426
Location: U.S
Quote:
Quote:
Doesn't make sense to me either. I've never read any PUA books, so I didn't know thats what Style suggested. Maybe someone who is familiar with Style's technique can chime in, because I have no idea why you would do that.
I've only read Style's book "The Game" but basically he makes him seem uninterested, or uneligible. He does this so hes not threatening to anyone, but then he pretends to slowly let his attraction to her grow over time. This makes it seem more organic, so the girl believes that she charmed you into liking her. Like he used the line "If I wasn't gay, youd be so mine" so he seems like a fun, nice guy, but wont hit on her because hes gay.
It makes sense...to an extent. You can still seem uninterested and slowly attract the girl without saying that you are taken or gay. I mean using those lines is just plain dumb. Unless you are already a smooth talker you are gonna dig yourself a hole.

Using disqualifiers and body language (such as not facing directly towards her instead more of a sideways stance) can give off the same impression.

_________________
"To Give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift" -Prefontaine

Not a PUA just a girl offering my opinions/advice


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:20 pm 
Offline
New to MPUA Forum

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:59 pm
Posts: 10
I'd have to say using the "if i was gay routine" from Style is really really complicated. I'd have to say that you didn't say the disqualifier much. I'd suggest finding a different disqualifier that suits you.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link