| For those of you who read The Game, you may recall an interesting shift in Style's opinion and some things he points out about the state of the game towards the last third of the book.
* The game (as we know it, given that "game" is a general term/concept that existed before), and in particular, the seduction community, is becoming well known to the public.
* The game and the community is being criticized by observers from different fronts.
In addition, another force that backs up the first point is the airing of The Pickup Artist seasons 1 and 2 in 2007 and 2008. On top of the show and the book(s), we have countless magazines and nowadays blogs speaking on the subject. Again, this is from outside the community.
In short - some may consider this to be the turning point that brought the pick-up community into the mainstream.
You'll recall examples from one chapter in The Game where Style mentions that entertainment districts around the world are now teeming with "PUAs", and more and more girls are calling them out on it. Remember: This was [i]prior[/i] to 2005.
In fact, entire sub-routines have been developed to counter these bitch tests/hoops/congruence tests: "Let me run the Best Friends test on you guys.", "Are you one of those pick up artists, like Mystery?", "So exactly what is it about Pick Up Artists that you find so attractive?".
But this is an uphill battle. As Pick-up becomes more and more well known, each and every one of us are at higher risk of being blown out in set for using canned-material - or worse - have our alternative identities revealed to loved ones who shouldn't know we're doing this, but can figure it out because they've watched the show or read about the community.
I understand that this is the General Questions board, so let me phrase my questions:
1. Have you ever approached a set with routines and had the girls point out that you're gaming them?
2. Have you ever had other so-called "PUAs" confront you (either in the middle of running a set, or otherwise)? I realize that usually they're just bros who have come across material either through the show or The Game.
3. Have you yourself run into other so-called PUAs - or just AFCs who've read a bit about pickup - running well-known material?
And, finally:
4. How will the pick-up community, and individual PUAs, evolve their game as the community becomes more and more well known to the mainstream/public eye? What separates us as PUAs apart from the average guy who we have to assume knows a bit about the game?
I wanted to see what this community thought about this subject. I believe that pick up is strong, but the community is dying, as it's being absorbed and assimilated into mainstream culture. However, I had my own opinions and answers to the ultimate question.
First, traditional concepts that are not as effective:
* Peacocking is becoming normal - and therefore is no longer peacocking, because everyone does it. Look around you in a club today. Most of the guys are rocking some sort of additional flare. Usually stylish hats, or vests, and very often those damn leather bracelets that we're all (unofficially, I think) known for. In general, men are becoming better dressed, so everyone just seems to blend in.
How do we deal with this? Dress even crazier? Mystery-level crazy? No. Because now if you peacock too much, people will call you out on it, because they know about the game. And like I said above, if you peacock too little, you are out-peacocked by normal guys. The tables have turned.
So again, how do we deal with this? I honestly feel that this category is a lost cause, but I'd love to hear your opinion. I think that the future of the game lies more in external prop use rather than props that you wear. And, of course, in the material you choose to run.
* We have to assume that all openers that are in the public eye are "well known". This includes every line used in The Game, and every line used in The Pickup Artist. This mostly applies to openers: Who lies more, men or women? Did you see that fight outside? Do you floss before or after you brush? This also applies strongly to the category of negs: Your nose wiggles when you talk. You blink a lot. Are those nails real? A lot of this material sounds generic and sometimes forced, and therefore is at risk of being called out.
* We have to assume that the major classes of material are also "well known". I am speaking more broadly now: Opinion openers of any sort should be blacklisted. Some might fare better than others: "I need a female opinion on something" is a lot riskier than "My buddy and I were having an argument and we need to you help us settle it.", especially when you actually have your wing there.
Another suspect class are supernatural/magic related gambits: Best friends test. Pick a number between 1 and 4. The Cube (yes, especially The Cube). Strawberry Fields. Handwriting analysis. Palm reading. etc.
* Night game will overall be at higher risk than day game, since the community is much better known for that.
And now, concepts that still apply:
"Rare" material. Basically anything that is not "well known" because it's been buried in a forum for some time or traded through word of mouth. The more situational the material, the more genuine it will appear (see my example above with opinion openers). At this point in the game's evolution, it is a matter of being very convincing when you are delivering canned material.
The devil is in the details: Tons of traditional concepts still apply, especially when they involve details and not words. All concepts about body language and movement (locking in, kino in general, silent negs). Auxillary concepts like false time constraints are still effective and crucial, especially in the Mystery Method. IOIs are supposedly hard-wired and therefore still apply. However, we have to be a bit more creative then "I can only stay a second, I have to get back to my friends".
Wings will be key to survival. Having a wing will back up your image and make you appear more genuine. Who are all these friends you "have to get back to"? Well if there is someone else there, your value is actually backed up. I still believe that the accomplishment intro, when done right, is one of the most powerful gambits out there.
I believe highly in more recent and uniquely developed routines and concepts. One example is a purely kino move, "The Claw". There is a great post on it in this forum. Even new technologies will be essential to a PUAs freshness and success rate. Learning the Text game and the Facebook game will be vastly important. Online dating, however, is orthogonal to all that.
Finally, I believe the secret is going to lie a lot in obtaining Natural Game. That means [i]not[/i] canned material. Many people online claim that it comes easily to them, but I am sure a lot of people are saying that just as a way to brag. Improvisation in general is what I am referring to here, and it is not an easy thing to ease into. It is even harder to teach. If anything, seminars teach you canned material that makes you appear to be a natural, not help you become an actual natural.
The PUAs that survive are going to be the ones that achieve Natural Game. No, "un-naturals" do not count - I mean people who actually absorb the core concepts and deliver them through self-created speech. This is all a question of innovation, as there has to be a shift in the way PUAs run game in order to deal with this wave of scrutiny.
I am not here to say that the entire world knows every detail about everything we've learned and do. A girl at a bar who's seen an episode of The Pickup Artist isn't going to figure out that you're currently in A3, or that what you're taking her on is a "Day 2". She will, however, call you out on anything that starts with "I need a female opinion on something...". Or at least you should expect her to if you expect to continue playing the game.
===
Finally, as a footer, here were the things that I've seen over the past while that have provoked me to think through this and ultimately write this post:
* The part in The Game where Pick Up seems to be becoming very popular in major cities.
* An old online video of meehow where he actually encounters and handles a situation where a girl in set calls him out. Nicely done, but definitely a warning signal.
* Various interviews and appearances of well known PUAs in media: mostly talk shows but also on non-PUA blogs and occasionally in the news.
And finally:
* A frosh I met, who did not seem to be involved in the PUA world at all, who knew about peacocking and negs.
|