Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
| Author | Message |
| cerebralassassin | PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:24 pm | |
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
Posts: 793 | | i want to bring up a debate what is it better to be a 'natural' or a pick-up artist? to me they are very different things a natural is someone who has a charm, confidence and is naturally good with women. a pick-up artist is someone who has had to learn techniques and skills to get laid. i would say that i am a pick-up artist as i know i have no natural talent with women i had to learn how to do it through techniques and skills and observation.
_________________
life sucks and then you die! deal with it
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
| Oga | PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:42 pm | |
| Offline | | MPUA Forum Enthusiast |
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:37 pm
Posts: 49
Location: Dublin, Ireland | | I don't really know which one I should vote for. Basically, I have always been able to build rapport very quickly with people (when my family went on holiday, my sister was always jealous that me and my twin brother could make friends with ease), but PU helped me accentuate my skills, and bring up areas in which i was lacking i.e getting women on a regular basis. A pua can be just as good, if not better than a natural, because a pua strives or should strive for a rock-solid, bulletproof game.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
CHAT