I like both.. but David D seems to take a more human approach to things while Mystery's stuff can be to routine based... what do you guys think and why?

Mystery is the king of picking up women, not so great at keeping them, David D is more a dating expert than a PUA

A combination of both and you're onto a winner!

what I do more closely resembles DD, but I want to learn Mystery more... it seems cooler, more like a game with thrill and excitement... I need adrenaline. I don't wanna double my dating which is what I'm getting now, I wanna learn to pick women up... something new...

each has their own method of the game, however they're very similar. some people like to follow a systematic approach to getting girls (mystery method), and others like a more human approach as was said before. they are both amazing at what they do and should be given medals, but its ultimately about your own self and your own personality.

Mystery is the best PUA i ve ever seen.

it all depends on your own personal style , one that youll hopefully develop throughout becoming a pua.

as an overview though .

david deangelo - cocky and funny - very natural

mystery - routines - very heavy emphasis on canned material.

and as for sundayraver have you read any of david d's stuff ? in his newletter he openly says that he doesnt deal with relatonships.

jay dog , youve clearly never heard of 60 years of challenge

_________________
Seize the day

it all depends on your own personal style , one that youll hopefully develop throughout becoming a pua.

as an overview though .

david deangelo - cocky and funny - very natural

mystery - routines - very heavy emphasis on canned material.

and as for sundayraver have you read any of david d's stuff ? in his newletter he openly says that he doesnt deal with relatonships.

jay dog , youve clearly never heard of 60 years of challenge

_________________
Seize the day

I don't really care who's "better," 'cause I can learn from both. Certain situations, I imagine that some of Mystery's routines are probably better (in cold approaches or at the beginning of relations). But if I'm talking to women I've known, doing routines could get a bit weird yet 'cocky and funny' comes very natural to me. But I'm not into what one college professor once called 'binary oppositions,' that is "I believe in one thing, so I must be against the other." There's probably quite a bit of overlap in both methods. But Mystery offers a structure for seduction (personally, I think Neil Strauss AKA Style is a better, more refined Mystery Method) whereas DeAngleo is more off-the-cuff. But at the end of the day, I'm sure Mystery comes off as cocky and funny to his Sarges if he's still actually Sarging and doesn't just use routines while DD probably uses some structure and scripted (a term I prefer to 'canned') situational responses...

_________________
There is no such thing as failure, just opportunities for learning...

This is an official warning for violation of forum rule # 1

Your next offence may result in a ban

Read the rules before posting again