Quote:
I never refer to a woman as a number because their are women I'm into and those I'm not. Nothing in between.
I agree that this should be the case on a personal level. But rating someone is useful on a practical level as well. You would not game the HB6 the same way as you would the HB10. There are very significant sociological differences between the various levels that are a direct result of those levels.
For instance, negging would be more likely to be effective when the target is a HB10. This is because they, as HB10s, are used to being validated by AFCs via compliments, favors, and other displays of lower value. They respond to negs primarily because they are not used to being treated as if they are not special and having their flaws acknowledged. In this case, a neg would be a very appropriate DHV because it is first lowering her value.
However, the HB6 is often passed up for the HB10 and as a result may suffer from lower confidence despite having her fair share of male attention. While negs would be effective as a DHV, you could possibly be even more effective by using standard C&F and other forms of DHV that focus the attention on you displaying your higher value rather than using negs which would focus on her. And HB6 would be less in need of having her value lowered and would be naturally more receptive to accepting your DHV without the need to first have her value lowered.
I realize that the whole system of ranking targets seems shallow and superficial to those outside the community, and that's understandable. But when you really delve into the psychology involved, and the adaptation required, you realize that it's very necessary and not simply a pissing contest or trophy to add to the wall.