You have to learn to be yourself, more importantly to express it, and change it.
I'd wonder into where "be your best self" comes from?
PU is about the student, it is about them. Fuck the method. That's not attractive, it's who's using it. At the end of the day she wants to fuck YOU not the PU manual stuffed into your bookcase.
It's strange how as PUA's develop you'd think they would get more conciously technical, yet the opposite tends to hold truth.
Yes the experienced PUA's can break down what their doing, but in reality they are just doing it by themselves.
Example: I asked around about mehows group attration manifesto, considering buying it, only to find that alot of the main principles I was doing naturally.
Often PU's development of inner game tends to be the stripping away the anxieties and the internalisation of a few simple beliefs.
In effect being yourself is a GREAT tip for anyone. But most people don't understand it.
Example: If an AFC was being honest and being himself, free of anxieties and pressures to "do the correct thing"
He wouldn't be paying for drinks, he wouldn't give needless compliments he would do what is genuine.
Things like supplicating and holding the woman above you are really unnatural behaviours to have. They just don't make sense.
I can see where your coming, guys are going to need more than "be yourself as advice" to make them good, they need to have a wider understanding of whats happening in interactions, and they are going to need to practise this in social enviroments.
The attraction code I liked, becuase it was really a no bullshit this is how women are this is how men are, this is what you want this is what they want. Now go and talk to them.
It was a really good peice on PU yet it was strangely incredibly vague in how to go about working these factors. It gave you what you needed and let you build on that.
Could I question into what specefic kind of advice you'd offer instead? Or are you just ranting for the sake of it
