Handling Approach Anxiety (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 2:24 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:11 pm
Posts: 86
If you want to be better with women and I have to choose only one thing for you, then it's how to handle approach anxiety. If you can handle that then even the worst guy in the world will eventually get a girlfriend. Then it's just the law of large numbers that applies.

A psychotherapist can use cognitive psychology to handle your approach anxiety (cognitive behavioral therapy). The model is called ABC.

The ABC Model

The ABC model is a technique used in therapy. It's a way to identify our negative automatic thoughts. This gives us an idea how we think. Eventually, we'll see patterns and see that our thoughts often are irrational. So how does it work?


A = Activating Event
B = Belief/Thought
C = Emotional and Behavioral Consequence


A = Activating Event
I want to approach her and start a conversation.

B = Belief/Thought
I don't know what to say! What if she doesn't like me? What if she's rude? What if she already has a boyfriend?

C = Emotional and Behavioral Consequence
Anxious, fear of approaching her.

Now, we have identified our emotions. Next is to challenge our thoughts. Are they rational? Are they logical? Are you right? Challenge them. Now the letter D comes.

D = Dispute With Evidence
Why am I anxious? What will happen when I don't know what to say? Just an awkward silence. No big deal. I can use eye contact and smile. Maybe she will ask me something. If she doesn't like me then I know I don't have to waste my time. She's not the one for me. If she yells at me, at least I have tried. Maybe she won't yell at me and likes me. If she has a boyfriend, she will tell it to me so I don't waste my time.

Now, it all suddenly looks stupid to fear approaching women. If you don't try you automatically get a "No", but if you try, maybe it can turn to a "Yes".

Next time you fear to approach a woman. Use the ABC(D) Model and identify your negative thoughts. Are they rational? Are they logical?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:41 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:21 am
Posts: 58
Location: Reseda, CA
great post!


Here is a list of common Cognitive Distortions, always challenge your own thoughts.

1. Filtering.

We take the negative details and magnify them while filtering out all positive aspects of a situation. For instance, a person may pick out a single, unpleasant detail and dwell on it exclusively so that their vision of reality becomes darkened or distorted.

2. Polarized Thinking (or “Black and White” Thinking).

In polarized thinking, things are either “black-or-white.” We have to be perfect or we’re a failure — there is no middle ground. You place people or situations in “either/or” categories, with no shades of gray or allowing for the complexity of most people and situations. If your performance falls short of perfect, you see yourself as a total failure.

3. Overgeneralization.

In this cognitive distortion, we come to a general conclusion based on a single incident or a single piece of evidence. If something bad happens only once, we expect it to happen over and over again. A person may see a single, unpleasant event as part of a never-ending pattern of defeat.

4. Jumping to Conclusions.

Without individuals saying so, we know what they are feeling and why they act the way they do. In particular, we are able to determine how people are feeling toward us.

For example, a person may conclude that someone is reacting negatively toward them but doesn’t actually bother to find out if they are correct. Another example is a person may anticipate that things will turn out badly, and will feel convinced that their prediction is already an established fact.

5. Catastrophizing.

We expect disaster to strike, no matter what. This is also referred to as “magnifying or minimizing.” We hear about a problem and use what if questions (e.g., “What if tragedy strikes?” “What if it happens to me?”).

For example, a person might exaggerate the importance of insignificant events (such as their mistake, or someone else’s achievement). Or they may inappropriately shrink the magnitude of significant events until they appear tiny (for example, a person’s own desirable qualities or someone else’s imperfections).

With practice, you can learn to answer each of these cognitive distortions.
6. Personalization.

Personalization is a distortion where a person believes that everything others do or say is some kind of direct, personal reaction to the person. We also compare ourselves to others trying to determine who is smarter, better looking, etc.

A person engaging in personalization may also see themselves as the cause of some unhealthy external event that they were not responsible for. For example, “We were late to the dinner party and caused the hostess to overcook the meal. If I had only pushed my husband to leave on time, this wouldn’t have happened.”

7. Control Fallacies.

If we feel externally controlled, we see ourselves as helpless a victim of fate. For example, “I can’t help it if the quality of the work is poor, my boss demanded I work overtime on it.” The fallacy of internal control has us assuming responsibility for the pain and happiness of everyone around us. For example, “Why aren’t you happy? Is it because of something I did?”

8. Fallacy of Fairness.

We feel resentful because we think we know what is fair, but other people won’t agree with us. As our parents tell us when we’re growing up and something doesn’t go our way, “Life isn’t always fair.” People who go through life applying a measuring ruler against every situation judging its “fairness” will often feel badly and negative because of it. Because life isn’t “fair” — things will not always work out in your favor, even when you think they should.

9. Blaming.

We hold other people responsible for our pain, or take the other track and blame ourselves for every problem. For example, “Stop making me feel bad about myself!” Nobody can “make” us feel any particular way — only we have control over our own emotions and emotional reactions.

10. Shoulds.

We have a list of ironclad rules about how others and we should behave. People who break the rules make us angry, and we feel guilty when we violate these rules. A person may often believe they are trying to motivate themselves with shoulds and shouldn’ts, as if they have to be punished before they can do anything.

For example, “I really should exercise. I shouldn’t be so lazy.” Musts and oughts are also offenders. The emotional consequence is guilt. When a person directs should statements toward others, they often feel anger, frustration and resentment.

11. Emotional Reasoning.

We believe that what we feel must be true automatically. If we feel stupid and boring, then we must be stupid and boring. You assume that your unhealthy emotions reflect he way things really are — “I feel it, therefore it must be true.”

12. Fallacy of Change.

We expect that other people will change to suit us if we just pressure or cajole them enough. We need to change people because our hopes for happiness seem to depend entirely on them.

13. Global Labeling.

We generalize one or two qualities into a negative global judgment. These are extreme forms of generalizing, and are also referred to as “labeling” and “mislabeling.” Instead of describing an error in context of a specific situation, a person will attach an unhealthy label to themselves.

For example, they may say, “I’m a loser” in a situation where they failed at a specific task. When someone else’s behavior rubs a person the wrong way, they may attach an unhealthy label to him, such as “He’s a real jerk.” Mislabeling involves describing an event with language that is highly colored and emotionally loaded. For example, instead of saying someone drops her children off at daycare every day, a person who is mislabeling might say that “she abandons her children to strangers.”

14. Always Being Right.

We are continually on trial to prove that our opinions and actions are correct. Being wrong is unthinkable and we will go to any length to demonstrate our rightness. For example, “I don’t care how badly arguing with me makes you feel, I’m going to win this argument no matter what because I’m right.” Being right often is more important than the feelings of others around a person who engages in this cognitive distortion, even loved ones.

15. Heaven’s Reward Fallacy.

We expect our sacrifice and self-denial to pay off, as if someone is keeping score. We feel bitter when the reward doesn’t come.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:15 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 3:38 pm
Posts: 323
Good stuff here on this post.

What got me over the hump was imagining that I had already succeeded in laying the girl. I imagined that feeling before I go into sets, and it works well. I got this idea from Tony Robbins.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:31 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:46 pm
Posts: 383
Sometimes it`s amazing what you can find on the internet that describes your way of seeing the world and how pathetic it is.

I have to change my thought pattern, but there is one thing I want to ask before I start to analyze and try to change my view on things:

In general, I have a black or white mantality when it comes to people: This is a way of seeing people as my friends or my enemies. And this approach on the world is what I found practical, because I think that every stranger is a thief/ lier or something among those lines, until I`m proven wrong.

This mindset I`ve developed over years of giving people chances they never diserved in the first place. This is why now I hesitate on wheter to give or not give em a chance.

This falls for the black or white cathegory, but for some reason in my experience this has some logic to it, people indeed tends to dissapoint you.

What do you guys think?


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:05 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 4:46 pm
Posts: 1707
Saw this on seddit as well .. I still think exposure therapy makes way more sense than this ABC model for treating approach anxiety.

_________________
http://www.joshsway.com -- dating, online dating, fitness, fashion, and more...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 11, 2014 2:03 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Enthusiast

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:21 am
Posts: 58
Location: Reseda, CA
Quote:
This falls for the black or white cathegory, but for some reason in my experience this has some logic to it, people indeed tends to dissapoint you.
^^^this is called avoidant personality disorder, CBT is probably in order for you, try "mindGYM" google it.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 1:47 pm 
Offline
High Priest of Debauchery
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:48 pm
Posts: 3271
Location: Paradise Found
Without fixing someone's inner game, CBT will not work.

But to fix someone's inner game, a basic understanding of defense mechanisms is crucial. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_mechanisms

_________________
Approach. Open. Escalate. Isolate

Here are my two essential rules on texting that will save you tons of time and money:

general-questions/topic137931.html


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link