men overall work longer hours in more dangerous conditions and are still expected by society, even with feminist and "women's independence" to pay for child support, even if the woman was the instigator of domestic violence in the relationship. despite women having changed, they still demand preferential SPAM, which shouldn't be given to them, if they demand equality; and fail to meet the responsibilities that civilisations have expected from women since the beginning of time. Raising kid and keeping the population growing. You can't have it both ways, don't expect men to make concessions if they are not going to get anything in return. I applaud the males who reject post modern western women, i mean really the state of affairs today would be laughable if it wasn't so tragic.
These gynocentric views, that want men to be little slave drones that can be made disposable by the modern's women's whim, is tearing apart society, and no one notices, because women are still perceived as victims, a myth which is perpetuated by feminists.

Bottom line is women have to take responsibility which they don't have to do with this victim mentality. If you are having sex with a lot of different men and living a polygamous lifestyle, don't expect to find a man who is going to be responsible himself and treat you with respect.

Just a thought, that i believed should be put out there !

With the help of manginas. Femcunts have made it so that in every situation men are considered at fault, and this has been allowed to happen by the stupid men who don't stick up for their own gender.

SE23, to complement what you have written, see this quote by Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Precisely here I saw the great danger to humanity, its most sublime lure and temptation – and into what? into nothingness? – precisely here I saw the beginning of the end, the standstill, the backward-glancing tiredness, the will turning against life, the last sickness gently and melancholically announcing itself: I understood the ever more widely spreading morality of compassion – which seized even the philosophers and made them sick – as the most uncanny symptom of our new uncanny European culture, as its detour to a new Buddhism? to a Buddhism for Europeans? to – nihilism? For this preferential SPAM and overestimation of compassion on the part of modern philosophers is something new . . ."

Christianity connects to cultural marxism, exactly through this emphasis on compassion, that it basically makes a defense of the weak the only morally legitimate claim to be into politics in the first place.

Nietzsche thinks socialism and Christianity have the same basic thing going on underneath: ressentiment.
resentment of the weak and oppressed which is unable to express itself directly and outwardly, so it mendaciously expresses itself in a surreptitious manner "in effigy."

Our sympathy for the meek and downtrodden, as the Bible teaches that the meek will inherit the earth, and not the strong, the powerful, the virtuous (as is taught by Ancient Greeks, Romans and Viking culture, for instance - read Homer or else the Edda, or Virgil).

Politicians nowadays excell at using victims, meaning vulnerable minorities, to campaign in their name, women being the favourite group. Exploiting the victimhood-fixation of Western civilization. Meaning our extreme sensitivities when it comes to dealing with minorities. Essentially Western civilization is horrified of repeating the sin of sacrificing Jesus on the cross, crusades, slave trade, klu klux clan, holocaust and what not - bottom line is that Western civilization tends to be contrite when dealing with minorities. This explains why, for example, the EU supports a set quotum for women on boards of large companies.

This sensitivity then connects to passive aggression. Passive aggression means crawling into the position of the victim, to attack you from there, pretending you stepped on their toes first. Their whole behaviour is geared towards seeking a legitimate reason to attack you and vent rancor and resentment: Hence Nietzsche argues against feminism as a doctrine of resentment.

At the end of the Mediëval Age, the Christian Pax Dei Movement (God's Peace), sought to ban Jousts and Melees; they considered these demonstrations of the knightly virtues only as violent and aggressive. As Montesquieu and Georges Duby have argued, Christianity then sought to subliminate these virulent energies into the courtly love; this is where legends come from such as those of the Holy Grail and of the Knight climbing up a a tower on the braids of a locked-up girl.

Today, this directly connects with Western society's victimhood-fixation; we all know the teenage comedies in which the fat, ugly outsider kid still manages to pull off a stunt and win over the high-status cheerleader girl. Our sensitivity to the underdog lead to the rise of romance novel culture; also called "Disney-reality" which is a sugar-coated story that completely contradicts the experience of daily reality. Which leads to a distorted inner life, also known as "cognitive dissonance."

This romance novel culture always features a Knight on the White Horse; women expect to feel "the vibe", whereas relationships are in reality going through peaks and hardships together and learning to deal with each other's shortcomings. Men can just never win in the circumstances of Western civilization: On the one hand, cultural marxism teaches that genders and role patterns are mere "constructions"; men are guilty because they built the role pattern of the affectionate and tender mother-the-wife which has kept women out of business, office and politics. On the other hand, men's high testosterone levels make them predators by nature (which is then, conveniently, somehow not a construction), and thus by default suspected and at fault when it comes to sex-offences.

Yep. Manginas are worse than feminists.

Agreed, they are often the worst, especially the ones who are teaching their male offspring, to abandon their masculinity.

Oh god, all this talk about how women have it easy.

Look guys, you are a fucking man. You could be born ugly but with status, confidence, game, and other things you could land a 9/10 woman. Yet, an ugly woman has no means of landing an attractive husband because men are hardwired to focus on just looks. Yes, you are more likely to be held accountable and society won't make life easy for you, but at the end of the day you set the standards of society and it moves to please you. Men set beauty standards and women have to adhere to them.

Every beautiful woman out there needs a strong man to protect her. So seriously, no, you don't have it as bad as you think you do.

_________________
I just come on here these days to give advice and read interesting threads. Gone are the days when I came to seek advice and validation.

What does that even mean? Everything about your post screams "white knight".
Just because a woman is beautiful, it gives her a free pass to be a bitch? Fuck that. I'd rather lose an HB and spend weeks looking for another one (done that, no regrets) than to give one special SPAM just because she's "beautiful".
Most "ugly" women you see are only ugly because they don't take care of themselves, have shitty diet, don't exercise, and don't use makeup. Just the same, most "beautiful" women you see are beautiful because they diet, exercise, and wear tons of makeup and cosmetics. I've woken up with "Hot babes" in the morning to see a mess, after the makeup comes off (I was sober the night before).
Yes, some women have attractive features that make it easier for them to look good, and others are born with Pinocchio noses or ugly chins and are condemned to a life of the ugly, but even so, they can almost always compensate by having a good body, and do well for themselves. The exact same (minus makeup), applies to guys, who have less power to change how they look.
People like you enable spoiled, immature brats to expect men to bend over backwards for them just because they're "cute". The mangina generation has made women so entitled and spoiled, that it makes game for self respecting guys more difficult, because of the expectation for them to act like a pussy to get any.
I have dealt with this taken to an extreme in Sweden. Good luck hooking up with a swede if you don't let them make a doormat out of you. I was spending all my time with the erasmus girls (other Europeans), who had personalities that were about 50 times better, because in Sweden, the women are strong, and the men are beautiful, and if you try to challenge that social construct, they won't want anything to do with you. Every guy I knew that was south of Denmark (another Manginastan) said the exact same thing.

Me along with a few others are starting a movement, A big part of this book will be centred around feminism and the disposable male. It will be about the changing dynamics of male and female relationships and relationships in general, and the wider implications this places on western civilisation.
There will be a look at the victim mentality of Western culture; cultural Marxism conflicts with the values that all technology Western civilisation was essentially founded upon, are now being dismantled.
We will examine previous civilisations and how they have risen and fell. Going way back to Judeo-Christianity and Greek-Roman views on democracy, cultural marxism has led to a passive aggressive culture, which is only sustainable by the wealth created by foundations which modern day culture decides to dismantle.

This is what commercial advertisement has you believe. They focus on make-up and whatnot. Take a look at make-up: If one women wears make-up, the other in her friends group will wear it too. Because else she feels she loses out on the men or in her appearance. And this is competition women create for one another. By the way, did you know that the first women who started shaving their legs were prostitutes? Okay, maybe men compete about cars and about football, but that's about it, and personally I don't give a crap about cars and football. I care about reading good books and about my own sports, not about comparing to those of others. The competition between women goes much deeper, is all-present, it's in the needle-veins of society.

I started to look at the world and I saw girls fight over lipsticks, over who had the cutest dress. I saw rivalry between neighbouring ladies because one had a more freshly cut lawn. I saw envy between mothers because one's kid has higher grades with math. If guys fight, they duke it out and afterwards things are okay again. But if women fight, they will forever gossip behind each other's backs, while putting up a smile in public. Women can't end a fight; all they can is temporarily bury the hatchet. It is women that oppress women, not men.

Women often assume an attitude, because many of them see the game of love as a struggle between the sexes – they play hard to get, thinking that whoever yields first to his emotions comes across as desperate, and is therefore the weaker one. A man is different in this than a woman: he will settle for a reliable partner with a fresh face or that he can otherwise have a laugh with. He has tangible, definite goals that he solidifies by working towards them step by step. The woman counts on the man to do this for her – a part of her counts on him to give direction to her life. She will unconsciously resent him if he doesn’t, but she will also resent him if he doesn’t respect her capricious choices as autonomous wishes. Therefore he will never do it right, and always suffer the fallout. She wants to able to count on their man to sustain her and provide for her wishes, yet she wants to be independent and self-supplying.
Great idea - excellent initiative! I sign up for it.

Are you kidding me? I don't know where you live, but I see big, fat, and ugly women with normal-looking guys everywhere. Ugly chicks, out of shape, acting like they're hot shit in the club because guys are all on their jock.

During my trial separation with my wife, I met up with an old friend who was a real cutie back in high school, but she has let herself go past the point of no return (she is headed towards Lap-Band land). She has two kids from a father who is not paying any child-support and then she has the nerve to say she would not date a man who has any kids. Like, "Bitch, are you serious? You really think you got it going on like that?" But why does she think like that? Because guys are still picking up on her, therefore, she has options.
I don't know if you've noticed, bro, but most chicks are dressing to impress each other, not us. My wife asks me how her outfit looks and I say she looks great, and what does she do? Change into something else.

_________________
"You ain't accustomed of going through customs. You ain't been nowhere, huh?"

Excellent post about the dress! Says a lot and is really true.

Some questions though. Why did you trial-seperate your wife? What was the reason for this? And what is Lap-Band land?

Oh my god, just shut up and go get your dicks wet, good god. Total whiners.

Lol... I love that here are higher order thinkers on a PUA website. Its how I know I'm in the right place. I agree there is this attitude that is endemic in american society that women and minorities are victims of privileged white male oppression. To suggest otherwise is invalid and to suggest that they are capable of victimizing is invalid. I played this game with my friends to try to think of five Hollywood movies that came out in the last five years in which someone other than a somehow privileged (thru wealth or strategic positioning) american male was the villain. It couldnt be done. The only exception I could think of were direct threats to US national security such as zero dark thirty or captain Philips. Once again, still male. Apparently Americas only enemies are terrorists and men.

Marriage is falling apart (both to blame). I travel a lot for work and she has always felt that I was out screwing around when I was 100% committed, no fucking around. Meanwhile, she's blowing through my cash like there's no tomorrow and acting like I contribute nothing to the marriage, family (stepkids), and home.

On the other hand, that trial-separation is back on. I just need to pull the plug.

As far as Lap-Band land, that was a joke referring to Lap-Band surgery, which is what obese people get to lose a drastic amount of weight. This one lady where I used to work was really nice, but she was big. She left work for a month, came back, and she was rail thin. She went from being a nobody to a hottie. No joke. Hopefully, it becomes mandatory under Obamacare and we will be swimming in women.
Well, can you really name many movies that didn't have a 97% all White cast?

_________________
"You ain't accustomed of going through customs. You ain't been nowhere, huh?"

I know an exception; in the movies Taken and Taken2 Arabs and Serbs were the bad guys. However! Your preference of movie type also plays a role. If the themes feature "crime/bitches/life in the ghetto" then the cast makeup is probably different than in a movie about "strategic higher order thinking" or the mathematicians active in the Cold War.