Quote:
This reminds me of something. I recently met a guy who is a chess player. It turns out that his father taught him how to play, and his father learned it himself. So this guy now got his own style, doesn't play by the book, and he's got huge advantage of his opponents who don't know what to expect. If Mystery kept this knowledge to himself, opinion openers would still do great today, but hey, we wouldn't be here today.
I doubt that. I'm no grandmaster in chess but I'm very good at strategy and tactics. Unless this guy is ranked in the top 100 I very much doubt he can create plays that have never been used before - remember the plays in chess exist even before they were created, just like the game existed long before it was discovered, it's just now people are discovering rules that have existed for ages.
Chess is a textbook game; once you're at the top level it's basically a game of noughts and crosses, you know every play inside out and you know what to expect, nothing surprises you anymore.
As for the opinion openers, they still work for me. The "girl to number of practising PUA" ratio must be massively in favour of the girl side.