DIRECT VS INDIRECT OPENERS



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests
Post new topic Reply to topic   Board index » Get Into The Game: New Forum Members Start Here » PUA Lounge




Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline
Member of MPUA Forum

Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:26 pm
Posts: 132
Yahoo Messenger: pagedusty@rocketmail.co.za
Location: Cape Town
Awesome Post!!!
Matter of fact, that's klnda how my personal game goes, Open indirect then transition to direct with a (SOI) Statement of Intent, with in a matter of minutes and most of the in a matter of seconds.
see alota guys think of indirect game as simply "Mystery Method" Story telling, Negs, Routines etc. Which btw is crap.

I can walk up to a girl, make a comment on whatever she's wearing and at any point shift the interaction direct and sexual, by making a bold and confident gesture. Not every girl is goin to be DTF, but what Indirect game allows you to do is, to flip a no into a maybe and a maybe into yep. It's still cool to be able to screen for DTF girls, make no mistake. But I firmly believe that a true PUA should able to adapt in any situation doesnt matter what the setting. Spit both Direct and Indirect game fluently and become a HYBRID PICK UP ARTIST

Thats just me!!

_________________
http://realsocialdynamics.com/


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:40 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:29 am
Posts: 244
Quote:
I read a lot of posts stating "when should I use direct game, when should I use indirect game. The fact of the matter their is no set or specific time to use either, it all depends on your target and current settings.

If I were to suggest one or the other, I would suggest indirect, as with indirect you can always still have the option to become direct, especially after some sort of comfort is established. But! if you crash and burn with direct, you are generally blown out and most likely will not be able to recover.

The idea behind this is, generally any approach is in essence a direct approach. Our body language usually dictates our physical interest. When men approach a good looking woman his attraction is usually implied( unconsciously) therefore there really isn't a need to be ultra direct.

As long as you imply your interest through out your conversation( conscious) it will have the same effect, but this way, you allow the woman more time to gauge you and come to terms with whether or not you are a creep or if she has interest, or that you jumped through her conscious self created hoops.

You also allow yourself the opportunity to change her initial perception. I have heard many women tell me after a seduction that at first they weren't really attracted to me, but after talking and laughing, etc etc, they became attracted, none of this would of been possible or at least much harder, if I went in ultra direct. This can also work in reverse, women love to hear that you find them more attractive now that you got to know them better, you can sometimes act as though you had no direct intentions until they intrigued you and now you are overwhelmingly attracted to them. This tends to give a woman a form of self validation and shows your attraction is not just skin deep.

Women have an automatic defense no matter how smooth or good looking you are. It's generally trained into their conscious minds, usually the better looking she is the more prevalent it is. Some call this a bitch shield. If you get good at interpreting body language, none of that matters as if they are interested, you will see it through their physical mannerisms. And if you are good enough can most likely be able to break through the Bitch shield, However! The majority of men are not good at reading the signs, therefore its best to stay indirect, with the intentions of progressing and becoming direct.

In my opinion the only real time to use direct game is if you already have social value, for example at a house party where you know the majority of people there, or within your social circle when there is friends of friends, etc etc. Any situation where you are sought out. If you are being approached by a woman, you can be direct, if you have already observed IOI's or essentially making a warm approach, you can be direct. If it's quite obvious the girl has interest in you, be direct.

In short, from my experience, it's best to open indirect with direct intentions.
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline
The name of the mothefucking game
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 4210
Website: http://www.dancefloorseduction.com
Location: South Florida
Quote:
Quote:
I read a lot of posts stating "when should I use direct game, when should I use indirect game. The fact of the matter their is no set or specific time to use either, it all depends on your target and current settings.

If I were to suggest one or the other, I would suggest indirect, as with indirect you can always still have the option to become direct, especially after some sort of comfort is established. But! if you crash and burn with direct, you are generally blown out and most likely will not be able to recover.

The idea behind this is, generally any approach is in essence a direct approach. Our body language usually dictates our physical interest. When men approach a good looking woman his attraction is usually implied( unconsciously) therefore there really isn't a need to be ultra direct.

As long as you imply your interest through out your conversation( conscious) it will have the same effect, but this way, you allow the woman more time to gauge you and come to terms with whether or not you are a creep or if she has interest, or that you jumped through her conscious self created hoops.

You also allow yourself the opportunity to change her initial perception. I have heard many women tell me after a seduction that at first they weren't really attracted to me, but after talking and laughing, etc etc, they became attracted, none of this would of been possible or at least much harder, if I went in ultra direct. This can also work in reverse, women love to hear that you find them more attractive now that you got to know them better, you can sometimes act as though you had no direct intentions until they intrigued you and now you are overwhelmingly attracted to them. This tends to give a woman a form of self validation and shows your attraction is not just skin deep.

Women have an automatic defense no matter how smooth or good looking you are. It's generally trained into their conscious minds, usually the better looking she is the more prevalent it is. Some call this a bitch shield. If you get good at interpreting body language, none of that matters as if they are interested, you will see it through their physical mannerisms. And if you are good enough can most likely be able to break through the Bitch shield, However! The majority of men are not good at reading the signs, therefore its best to stay indirect, with the intentions of progressing and becoming direct.

In my opinion the only real time to use direct game is if you already have social value, for example at a house party where you know the majority of people there, or within your social circle when there is friends of friends, etc etc. Any situation where you are sought out. If you are being approached by a woman, you can be direct, if you have already observed IOI's or essentially making a warm approach, you can be direct. If it's quite obvious the girl has interest in you, be direct.

In short, from my experience, it's best to open indirect with direct intentions.
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?


If i got a dollar for all the time this scenario or similar get ask, i would be a millionaire, what happens is your actions show "lack of confidence"(not atractive) you are not Enough, she is more than you... Why? because you took too long to open after multiple invitations...

_________________
Learn the proper way to maximize your results in a dancefloor/club environment, check out my blog and youtube channel:
http://www.dancefloorseduction.com

Dancefloor/Club game youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/dancefloorseduction


Top
   
 Post subject: Hi
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
MPUA Forum Zealot
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 4:51 pm
Posts: 365
Location: Birmingham
plus 1.

I know so many guys get interest then ruin it by showing hesitancy.

_________________
Meet and Wing.

direct-game-birmingham-friends-that-wil ... 30930.html

The Jackal an Introduction.
[link]

The Field Reports.
[link]

The Lay Reports.
[link]


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:02 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:18 pm
Posts: 2130
Website: http://www.thescienceofnaturalgame.com
Quote:
Quote:
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?


If i got a dollar for all the time this scenario or similar get ask, i would be a millionaire, what happens is your actions show "lack of confidence"(not atractive) you are not Enough, she is more than you... Why? because you took too long to open after multiple invitations...
I agree!

I'd like to add that he didn't sound like he was interesting at all, where you from, I'm from. bla bla. Who gives a fuck? Flirt up front interview in back, be fun to start let her "qualify" you later. Compliment her, give her something to think about, make her smile, but giving her thoughtless questions are bland and make you just some other guy interested. Set yourself apart, make it interactive.

You made it difficult to interact, boring, uninteresting, you followed her like a puppy dog, didn't accept any of her signals forever, showed little confidence as skills said. Honestly you made it as difficult as possible to maintain or start an actual attraction.

It would be fine to not except multiple invitations if he didn't acknowledge they existed for a minute. You can let her build some sexual tension for you while you play the attractive high status male a bunch of other women are interested in. Then choose your target and switch gears to escalation/seduction. It's pretty basic and easy. I've done this before, SexAddict does something similar off of what I've read from his style (we share a similar style). It's a good thing when you can build sexual tension and attraction with multiple women in the same place.

On a train in this situation, he should have been reading or listening to music, if you wanted to avoid confronting her attraction and build her sexual tension for you. She isn't as important as music or your book or as interesting to you currently. She will compete for interest by trying to grab your attention, preening, moving around, walking past, etc.

If you blabber in front of crowd don't be afraid to take the role as center of attention. In fact you need to enjoy it, trying to start a private conversation in front of a bunch of people is to direct and makes you more interested than her. This is a fatal mistake when her confidence is higher than yours. Just start joking about the train, a funny story that happened in the past when you road it. You need to be confident talking then just include her by making eye contact and smiling. She'll jump in if you do it right.

_________________
Just another guy from back in the day.

Blogging again living life: http://www.Scienceofnaturalgame.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:13 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:17 pm
Posts: 871
Quote:
Quote:
I read a lot of posts stating "when should I use direct game, when should I use indirect game. The fact of the matter their is no set or specific time to use either, it all depends on your target and current settings.

If I were to suggest one or the other, I would suggest indirect, as with indirect you can always still have the option to become direct, especially after some sort of comfort is established. But! if you crash and burn with direct, you are generally blown out and most likely will not be able to recover.

The idea behind this is, generally any approach is in essence a direct approach. Our body language usually dictates our physical interest. When men approach a good looking woman his attraction is usually implied( unconsciously) therefore there really isn't a need to be ultra direct.

As long as you imply your interest through out your conversation( conscious) it will have the same effect, but this way, you allow the woman more time to gauge you and come to terms with whether or not you are a creep or if she has interest, or that you jumped through her conscious self created hoops.

You also allow yourself the opportunity to change her initial perception. I have heard many women tell me after a seduction that at first they weren't really attracted to me, but after talking and laughing, etc etc, they became attracted, none of this would of been possible or at least much harder, if I went in ultra direct. This can also work in reverse, women love to hear that you find them more attractive now that you got to know them better, you can sometimes act as though you had no direct intentions until they intrigued you and now you are overwhelmingly attracted to them. This tends to give a woman a form of self validation and shows your attraction is not just skin deep.

Women have an automatic defense no matter how smooth or good looking you are. It's generally trained into their conscious minds, usually the better looking she is the more prevalent it is. Some call this a bitch shield. If you get good at interpreting body language, none of that matters as if they are interested, you will see it through their physical mannerisms. And if you are good enough can most likely be able to break through the Bitch shield, However! The majority of men are not good at reading the signs, therefore its best to stay indirect, with the intentions of progressing and becoming direct.

In my opinion the only real time to use direct game is if you already have social value, for example at a house party where you know the majority of people there, or within your social circle when there is friends of friends, etc etc. Any situation where you are sought out. If you are being approached by a woman, you can be direct, if you have already observed IOI's or essentially making a warm approach, you can be direct. If it's quite obvious the girl has interest in you, be direct.

In short, from my experience, it's best to open indirect with direct intentions.
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?
In this situation it's hard to give you a definitive answer, as I could not bare witness to her mannerisms. BUT! based on your comments, I'd have to agree with the above posters Skills360 and Poeticlyskuac. You were too hesitant, you waited to long and showed a lack of confidence when you finally did approach.

In the future, you still could have made it a successful approach outside when you did approach, but by this time you would should have engaged her in a different manner.

Mistake # 1:
You opened too personally, "where are you from" this can be very personal if the person is from a country, or area that is somewhat controversial ie: poor area, racial, religious or politically charged. It also came off more like an interview rather then a genuine comment.

Because of your hesitance to approach, it would of been in your best interest to bring up an observation. Something that seemed to intrigue you enough to approach, and that would have been congruent with your unconscious interactions with her prior.

What you should of done when you did finally approach is made an observation, something like. Hey there, my name is X I couldn't help but notice you have a very unique style, even something in the way you walk, its quite unique. It kind of reminds me of the stylish women in my home town, country, etc etc. I am from X Are you familiar with that area, country, city and culture?

This observation would of in a sense, justified your hesitancy and made it seem you are only approaching now after making all of those observations and being triggered to approach.

Mistake # 2 When she did show resistance with her tonality, you should of remained confident and continued, walking away after her first reaction did in fact verify your lack of confidence. In a sense she was probably expecting you to walk away based on your hesitance prior. Sticking around and persisting may have worked for you in this case. In fact, at that point, you could of switched to direct, since you were basically already getting blown out, you may as well of shown your physical interest, at this point you really had nothing to lose.

After her initial response, a strong statement like, Ok I really didn't want to know where you are from. The fact of the matter is I saw you on the train, I was completely overwhelmed by you from the way you walked to how beautiful your eyes are. I don't generally approach beautiful women that's why it took so long, but there is something about you. I just couldn't resist. My name is X.

If she still showed attitude after that, then you could of walked away. The point here is that you would still have walked away feeling the same as you did but at this point you would have at least put your cards on the table.

Something to keep positive about all of this is, even though you may have made some mistakes, the fact of the matter is you still made an approach, and for that I commend you. Don't look down on yourself for this, rather use it as a learning experience and keep going.

In the future, if a woman floats around your orbit like this, interact with her immediately, you dont have to flat out say something right away, but you can always make some small gestures, a little smirk, smile, eye contact, anything that gets you into her mind and shows some sort of interest. You can have an unconscious conversation as easily as a conscious one if you do it right.

There is a fine line between, playing the game and stalking. The difference being, if you got into her head, all the rest is part of the game. If you haven't got into her head, you become the cute guy that is staring at her and following her. ( potential creep)

_________________
Seduce their mind and the rest will follow.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:50 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:17 pm
Posts: 871
Quote:
Quote:
If I don't get the appropriate signs of interest from her throughout our brief conversation I simply eject, but leaving on a high note. If that girls starts to show me unconscious signs of interest later, throughout the night I can easily re-engage her. Something I cannot do if she blew me out with a direct approach.
Nothing there says you can't re-engage a girl that has rejected you if you open with a direct opener. A lot of it comes down to how you go about things. From what you said to the girl to how you deliver the opener.
There is nothing saying you cannot re-engage her after a direct opener , but if she flat out rejected you, she will still have the same frame as she did when she initially rejected you. You will still be hard pressed to change her frame. She will have associated you with having physical interest and already dismissing you. This is a recipe for another rejection. You will most likely encounter an even bigger shield the second time around.

How would you re-engage her? Indirectly this time? or directly again? I really see no point, your cards were already played. However! had you gone indirect firstly, you would still be in the hand and could easily re-engage.

The reason I preach indirect in general and direct situational is the very fact that there is the right time to be direct and then any other time it's much easier to be indirect. I am not arguing for one or the other just really that there is a right time and place for both. In general, indirect should be the more common of the two.

I feel that you are just arguing for the sake of arguing Jurupa, this has become a common trend from you in many of my posts. I don't mind debating at all but if it's something personal, I really couldn't be bothered.

No offense either way, I appreciate yours and everyone else's input.

_________________
Seduce their mind and the rest will follow.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 12:59 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:57 am
Posts: 675
Location: Australia
Agreed with OP, Intent needs to always be clear (overtly or non-overtly, but clear regardless)

I generally go in direct, but I do choice what words I use depending on the situation and the girl. Because when your direct, your intent is usually clearer and you don't need any transitions from indirect to direct.

I find that sometimes if you go "over-direct" sometimes girls get a bit overwhelmed by it, freeze up, panic, feel uncomfortable or their friends go "HOW DARE YOU" and take her away.....

I always go in direct, make sure my intent is very clear, but I never go Stelar style direct, and all "I WANT MY DICK IN AND AROUND YOUR MOUTH".

I'm more of a "You are absolutely adorable/cute/sexy".

But overall Calibrated direct ftw!!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:39 am 
Offline
Dedicated Member

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:53 pm
Posts: 553
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I read a lot of posts stating "when should I use direct game, when should I use indirect game. The fact of the matter their is no set or specific time to use either, it all depends on your target and current settings.

If I were to suggest one or the other, I would suggest indirect, as with indirect you can always still have the option to become direct, especially after some sort of comfort is established. But! if you crash and burn with direct, you are generally blown out and most likely will not be able to recover.

The idea behind this is, generally any approach is in essence a direct approach. Our body language usually dictates our physical interest. When men approach a good looking woman his attraction is usually implied( unconsciously) therefore there really isn't a need to be ultra direct.

As long as you imply your interest through out your conversation( conscious) it will have the same effect, but this way, you allow the woman more time to gauge you and come to terms with whether or not you are a creep or if she has interest, or that you jumped through her conscious self created hoops.

You also allow yourself the opportunity to change her initial perception. I have heard many women tell me after a seduction that at first they weren't really attracted to me, but after talking and laughing, etc etc, they became attracted, none of this would of been possible or at least much harder, if I went in ultra direct. This can also work in reverse, women love to hear that you find them more attractive now that you got to know them better, you can sometimes act as though you had no direct intentions until they intrigued you and now you are overwhelmingly attracted to them. This tends to give a woman a form of self validation and shows your attraction is not just skin deep.

Women have an automatic defense no matter how smooth or good looking you are. It's generally trained into their conscious minds, usually the better looking she is the more prevalent it is. Some call this a bitch shield. If you get good at interpreting body language, none of that matters as if they are interested, you will see it through their physical mannerisms. And if you are good enough can most likely be able to break through the Bitch shield, However! The majority of men are not good at reading the signs, therefore its best to stay indirect, with the intentions of progressing and becoming direct.

In my opinion the only real time to use direct game is if you already have social value, for example at a house party where you know the majority of people there, or within your social circle when there is friends of friends, etc etc. Any situation where you are sought out. If you are being approached by a woman, you can be direct, if you have already observed IOI's or essentially making a warm approach, you can be direct. If it's quite obvious the girl has interest in you, be direct.

In short, from my experience, it's best to open indirect with direct intentions.
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?


If i got a dollar for all the time this scenario or similar get ask, i would be a millionaire, what happens is your actions show "lack of confidence"(not atractive) you are not Enough, she is more than you... Why? because you took too long to open after multiple invitations...
Why did she give multiple invitations? I mean if she thinks "he is not good for me if he did not aproach after 1st or second invitation" why would she continue to give third, fourth and so on invitations? Just so she could come of as a "winner" and turn him dowm?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:24 am 
Offline
The name of the mothefucking game
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:31 pm
Posts: 4210
Website: http://www.dancefloorseduction.com
Location: South Florida
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
addict, i hear you. it's very good advice. here's a situation that threw me off a bit though along those lines.

yesterday, getting on the train. HB9.5 looking at me. i walked by. stared a hole in my back. followed me to the department i went, brought back the suitcase. put it next to me. returned to her seat. walked past me again several times, then again to get on the phone, was acting like i did not really notice. obvious she wants me to approach like.

i went out to talk on the phone. we both finish about the same time. she hangs about. asked her where she was from (no opinion opener or some canned shit) told her where i was from (i could tell we were from the same region).

got the most half-hearted response i ever heard. not rude, but implying extreem disinterest by tonality. did not bother and went back to my seat. don't waste time on that shit. was it a hit test or a genuine response? i don't take it as a shit test, but just a clear IOD. what you think?

in your experience, did i misread her IOIs? almost impossible. don't care, but my goal is to have fun and learn. analyzed a bit.

would have been wiser to use a neg opener (HB 9.5), not follow her outside, may have come off needy. then again, blabbering something at her in front of a quiet train croud seemed off. the first time i was totally off on reading an HB.

maybe i'm just connecting everything to me but she was having a bad day or whatever.

what do you think?


If i got a dollar for all the time this scenario or similar get ask, i would be a millionaire, what happens is your actions show "lack of confidence"(not atractive) you are not Enough, she is more than you... Why? because you took too long to open after multiple invitations...
Why did she give multiple invitations? I mean if she thinks "he is not good for me if he did not aproach after 1st or second invitation" why would she continue to give third, fourth and so on invitations? Just so she could come of as a "winner" and turn him dowm?


For what i read she gave multiple hints, and invitations according to the poster, women do it subliminally, if the dude does not get the hint, or pretends not to get the hints and takes too long to approach, the women in her head sometimes associates that with a dude that is scare or lack of confidence(in her head she thinks, he thinks i am above him or too much for him since he is kind of scare), or it can even creep them out, which is unnatractive, a confident dude will make eye contact(not break it, let her break it), smile, point, smirk whatever and approach and use a better opener, Hi i am skills, or whatever, the where are you from opener was a bit weird, with that being said he approached, for me success is approaching, he just did it too late and with a bad opener, but he at least approach, and i respect that.. Women look for qualities, like confidence and decisiveness... those are attractive qualities along with wit, humor, smarts... He did not display any of those qualities... So in her head, the dude is not good enough...Or she lost the initial attraction...Due to his actions... No that is the reality, but is what the actions may show in her head, since she was INITIALLY according to the poster description interested... With that being said, he may have misread the signs..

_________________
Learn the proper way to maximize your results in a dancefloor/club environment, check out my blog and youtube channel:
http://www.dancefloorseduction.com

Dancefloor/Club game youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/dancefloorseduction


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:29 am 
Offline
MPUA Forum Addict
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:29 am
Posts: 244
thanks for tips guys, really were spot on! totally what i was thinking. approach was timed badly and weak, can make a world of a difference. too personal and boring, definitely. i was hesitant at first and women feel that sort of thing.

don't look down at myself at all, i learn from this stuff. and LOTS more where she came from. great points, though thanks again, i will do this differently from now on.

really try to apply the 3 second rule, but sometimes you're just better than others....


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline
Mr. Nemo

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 8:18 am
Posts: 3102
Location: OC, California
Quote:
The reason I preach indirect in general and direct situational is the very fact that there is the right time to be direct and then any other time it's much easier to be indirect. I am not arguing for one or the other just really that there is a right time and place for both. In general, indirect should be the more common of the two.
My point or more that I was getting at is that the sort of openers we use depends on the person not the situation at hand. Not to say there are times when one is more socially appropriate than the other, but more like humans of nature we use what appeals to us more. For you its indirect openers as it does have a lower rejection chance than direct and that is a goal of yours is to have a low rejection rate. For me its direct as I care less about the rejection rate and more like beating things around the bush. Not saying we don't use the other when needed. If things where situational wouldn't there be more people talking about when to use which sort of opener?

Why should one use indirect more than direct? Because of the lower rejection rate? Or the ability to have an easier time opening girls that didn't show any interest before opening?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:14 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:18 pm
Posts: 2130
Website: http://www.thescienceofnaturalgame.com
Quote:
My point or more that I was getting at is that the sort of openers we use depends on the person not the situation at hand. Not to say there are times when one is more socially appropriate than the other, but more like humans of nature we use what appeals to us more. For you its indirect openers as it does have a lower rejection chance than direct and that is a goal of yours is to have a low rejection rate. For me its direct as I care less about the rejection rate and more like beating things around the bush. Not saying we don't use the other when needed. If things where situational wouldn't there be more people talking about when to use which sort of opener?

Why should one use indirect more than direct? Because of the lower rejection rate? Or the ability to have an easier time opening girls that didn't show any interest before opening?
In order for direct to work there must be immediate initial interest. Yes your confidence alone can grant you that, your looks, etc. but sometimes that means nothing to a girl. I am a good looking guy but by no means am I head turner, it's my personality that lands girls. I'm the ugliest one of my friends with the most skill with women out of my friends. My only ups are my confidence, charisma, and personality(making people smile/laugh), so this means indirect.

Using my most attractive feature is using my charisma and personality, I need to go indirect to give them a chance to see that. Now if I looked like my other buddy I would totally go 60 YOC style, just use my confidence, looks, and escalation. Stelar's style would be solid but I'm not a hot guy physically, my attractiveness is more related to how I make people feel.

Getting good with women involves learning to adapt, being a chameleon, adjusting, having dozens of techniques at your disposal to seduce a woman and using the right one for the moment. If you just want to get laid than direct has it's advantages, but if you want to learn to be good with women, to land a large as hell percentage of the women you go after then you learn that the situation tells you the tactic you need.

Initial attraction allows for a more direct approach (especially if it's strong initial attraction). Indirect allows if there isn't an initial attraction to build an attraction rather than find out the yes or no before you can use other tools in your seduction tool cabinet.

_________________
Just another guy from back in the day.

Blogging again living life: http://www.Scienceofnaturalgame.com


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:55 pm 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:17 pm
Posts: 871
Quote:

Why should one use indirect more than direct? Because of the lower rejection rate? Or the ability to have an easier time opening girls that didn't show any interest before opening?
Because of the social science of courtship, because based on the venue, women have a conscious "bitch shield" and because in certain situations, all other men that have approached her have been direct. Being indirect allow you much more wiggle room to apply game. Sure you can cut to the chase being direct, but that's just it, if she does not have an instant attraction to you, or is simply sick of men approaching stating their interest based on looks alone. There is a good chance she will not even give you a chance to seduce her mind.

Attractive women know they are attractive, they know a majority of men want to get in their pants, what they don't know is the type of character the man approaching has. If he is saying typical comments like. Hey I find you attractive, lets chat. Or hey you're cute, I'm interested, you are just part of the excepted masses in many social environments. If you are not in her typical attraction spectrum, you will be dismissed without the opportunity to build attraction or intrigue her with your wit and charm. In other words, you are leaving it all up to initial attraction only.

It's not about the rejection factor, it's about allowing yourself the opportunity work your game, to observe her reactions, to dictate the seduction. Most women have a set response to men approaching direct, its just reflex, some like to brush guys off right away in hopes they will keep persisting, some just do it for fun, most do it out of instinct. Either way, if you as a skilled observer/seducer an not allowed the time to interpret the woman's mannerisms, how are you suppose to seduce her out of her panties?

When one approaches in a direct manner, he is simply giving all the power to the woman and giving her every opportunity to escape. Most women would much rather not bother. Especially desirable ones. Approaching direct is limiting yourself.

I much prefer to approach indirect, build some rapport, look for the signs, then become ULTRA DIRECT. (women will tell you if they are interested within a few minutes of social interactions, especially if they do not have a conscious guard up)

Trust me when i tell you this, once i have the correct cue's I become a sexual beast, I do a hell of a lot more then state my attraction. But it is to an already warmed up target, one that has had the opportunity to gauge me, one that I had the opportunity engage, charm, and enter her thought process.

I don't just do this for her interest, I do it for myself, I like to gauge a woman as well, some chicks are hot as hell but a complete turn off once their personality comes out. I like to fuck their mind. Indirect approach allows me the opportunity to screen the women I WANT TO SEDUCE. It's not about them, it's about me. I want and demand to have the right to pick and choose.

Directness is absolutely necessary for seduction. It just doesn't have to be upon approach and in my opinion, doing it on approach is certainly limiting you possibilities. Seduction is an art it's the ability change a woman's perception and create an overwhelming desire from her to be with you. It's kind of hard to do if she tells you to scram the minute you talk to her.

It's like if a car sales man comes up to you and say's " hey do you want to buy this car" Yes or No? as opposed to him talking about a cars in general then showing you how cool a certain car is, then when you start to show interest for this car, they offer you a test drive and tell you it's for sale.

If you want to see my point or even hear it from the horses mouth. Try a social experiment. The next few attractive women you see. Go up to them and ask them. What type of approach from a man would they prefer. ( I have done this often)

Give them a typical direct approach and a typical indirect approach ( not opinion or any of that mystery crap)

I am certain most will prefer the indirect. I am basing this on years of practicing and inquiring myself.

In the end, it all comes down to whatever you prefer, as far as my students go, I preach indirect approach with direct intentions.

_________________
Seduce their mind and the rest will follow.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:25 am 
Offline
PUA Forum Leader

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:17 pm
Posts: 871
Quote:
Thank you Hobbit, this video is basically explaining the point i was trying to get across. He didn't get into the social or psychological aspects but the essence is there.

Thanks for sharing.

_________________
Seduce their mind and the rest will follow.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ] 

All times are UTC


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Can we be honest?

We want your email address. Let me send you the best seduction techniques ever devised... because they are really good.
close-link