Quote:
I don't really agree with what you've said here either. As far as I'm concerned, wanting something and needing something are the same thing in practical terms. It's the actions arising out of the need/want that matter. Need vs. want is just semantics.
From another viewpoint, we could also argue that since sex is a basic primary function of our animal nature that biologically we actually need sex rather than want it. Of course it can differ from person to person but it wouldn't be wrong from a biological standpoint to need it. If it's only the males who only merely want it that get a chance to procreate then the system wouldn't make sense.
If you feel bad when you get rejected then that's only natural I think. We're not robots. In an interview I watched with Frank Kermit he said something like "I don't care what anybody else says. No matter how good you get, rejections always hurt." And I like that.
Wanting something and
needing something is not the same at all. I don't understand how people on this board take certain PUA teachings hook line and sinker but aren't aware of the (few) more helpful aspects. There is an entire section dedicated to NLP. The core assumption of NLP is that word choice influences behavior. Try telling Jordan Belfort (the real Wolf of Wall Street) that word choice is largely just semantics. He will laugh in your face. Try telling any of the RSD instructors that word choice doesn't matter and they will also laugh in your face. (Tonality/body language matters as well, I'm not downplaying that).
Sex is not a biological need. It is a drive. You can't die from not having sex. Breathing, eating, drinking, and sleeping are all biological needs. The desire to have sex is driven by our needs to fulfill a sense of connection, self-esteem, autonomy, or security.
You're trying to straw man argue some evolutionary point. It is true that men have evolved high sex drives to contribute reproduction of the species. Women pay a higher risk biologically for sleeping with multiple partners and they evolved a more complex sex drive based around security. However, what makes us as humans different is our massive brains. We are more intelligent than any other species. The price to pay for that is slower child development. Monkeys take a few years to develop. A human child takes about 13 before it is somewhat self sufficient.
So we evolved a system of psychological emotional attachment and a (fairly) monogamous social structure in order to effectively raise our young. Our brains are chemically induced to cause us to get drunk off love when we meet a new chick in hoping to get us to stick around for a bit. This process is involuntary and universal...just like the drive to fuck. Evolution mixed up our sex drive with psychological needs for esteem and connection.
"Rejection always hurts". I agree and disagree. Does it hurt when you are dating a chick and she can't invest with you long term because she can't accept your flaws/insecurities? Fuck yes. Enough to put any dude out of commission for awhile (even though it is largely a simple matter of compatibility/chemistry). Does it (or should it) hurt when you decide to chat up a hot chick on the street and she isn't vibing you? Fuck no.
I could write a whole paper on the reasons for why you should never feel "rejected" for a girl not wanting to interact with you in some social setting. The primary reason being if you have values and boundaries towards the girls/people you let into your life, then you aren't some guy trying to just put your dick into every good looking hole. You have prerequisites to that shit. You have standards to how you wish to be treated. When you approach some lucky girl going about your daily routine, you are
giving her the opportunity to be inducted into your badass life. It's going to sound harsh, but most guys problem is that they don't have badass lives. They don't give value, they only wish to take. What is easier for a guy to do though? A) Re-think his core beliefs and lifestyle? or B) Read a "boyfriend destroyer" routine and memorize/recite it next time he is out?