Quote:
Quote:
Please don't embarrass Australia. A FEW wogs may shave their legs, but that doesn't make the conduct any less effeminate. Though I do agree that a person isn't necessary gay if they shave their legs.
Anyway, in response to the poster, I would strongly recommend that you do NOT shave your legs. At the time of the Olympics, I read a newspaper article that said that some men were beginning to shave their legs after seeing the unshaven skin of successful male swimmers, such as Phelps. BUT male swimmers have no choice - shaving is an aerodynamic requirement. The article concluded by stating that men shouldn't shave their legs. To support this view, it provided survey results that revealed that women are 'CREEPED OUT' by men with shaven legs.
If you want to PU, DON'T shave!
You're gonna base that on a newspaper article? That's the same source that says you should buy a girl you just met a drink and "just be yourself".
@OP It doesn't fucking matter if you shave your legs or not. You can be a hairy bear and if you play it right it'll work to your advantage. You can also have smooth legs and when she is touching them to feel how smooth they are and 20 minutes later you're having sex with her ask yourself how gay THAT is?
Just do what YOU'RE comfortable with and what you can make work for you.
NO I'm basing it on a SURVEY (conducted by a UNIVERSITY), which was reported in a newspaper. Anyway, it's common-sense.
A guy shouldn't shave his legs - it's way too feminine, although I agree that doing so doesn't make him gay. If your leg hair is very long, I guess you could trim it. But I think that a man shouldn't have smooth, hairless legs - and not surprisingly, many women think so too. While this obviously isn't a major issue in terms of a man's attractiveness, why go to the effort of shaving your legs when it isn't going to increase your success with women?
CHAT
