Unanswered topics | Active topics |
New posts | Your posts
Author | Message |
Dyvan13 | PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:38 am | |
Offline | New to MPUA Forum | Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 3:58 pm Posts: 5 | What do you guys think of his Pandora's box system that is centered around profiling women and deducing them down to the 8 types based on their tendencies to deal with certain mental conflicts?
I've obtained it from a friend and have been studying it like a college course for a few months now. It's helped me step up from a Very below AFC, at least I am getting some attention from females, to a slightly above afc. I'm still a gasp, virgin lol, but it gave me great insight into my relationship with my now ex girlfriend (I broke up with her, lol, she was just too immature and spoiled/princessy for me and it was a huge turn off)
I feel like it's leaving some holes here and there as it never really talks about anything like negging, dhv, amog, etc.
The reason I ask is that I have read some very malicious, even slanderous material about mr. Dicarlo on the net. I wanted to see what some of my fellow peers think.
No flakes was much more of a pua-type reading. mostly told me stuff I already knew, but the "attraction code" was a good read on female psychology and alpha male tendencies. I did learn one MAJOR thing though: Texting can be a GREAT way to create Intrigue (essentially "leaving somebody hanging", or "leaving a blank") and lack of intrigue is one of the main reasons women flake. And that working out fine details of a date over text messages can be a big excitement kill for you and her.
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|