Quote:
Does being in a relationship with an idiot, absolve the other partner from morals and ethics though?
Morals, no, Ethics no.
Do morals and ethics mean a woman should spend her one life, of which she will only ever get one shot at unsatisfied and unhappily married to an AFC who is probably inconsiderate or worse abusive and without enough education to even realise there is a problem and then probably sulks if a woman wants to talk about it.
Then again women usually would not say anything and seemingly out of the blue to an AFC ask for a divorce.
Women expect us to have the same ability to read subtle communications but lets face it we just aren't equipped with them. Women have them because its a mechanism they are hard wired with to know when a baby wants to eat or have his dyper changed and when we were living in tribal societies where an alpha male might be a threat to her or other females a threat to her potential ranking in the group hierarchy .
Women should realise twe are different and communicate on obvious ways like saying 'i'm unhappy lets sort this out' but when they do an AFC will usually throw a strop and sulk which is the opposite of rewarding them for the effort making them less likely to make an effort with someone else. Women in general and AF'CS can be idiots like that but P.U.A educates us to a level where we can read women like a book to bridge that gap.
That's what they mean when they say 'communication is key to a healthy relationship'
The breakdown of communication or lack of any to start with leads to unhappiness usually on the woman's part and the AFC will be oblivious and then the result is a divorce. Hence higher rate of women filing for a divorce?
That's my view anyway
CHAT