| PUA Forum https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Frequency of 10's ? https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=38227 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | The Big Bad Wolf [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Frequency of 10's ? |
How many 10's can there possibly be in any given situation ? Is it just me who think that there can be only one real 10 in a party ? -that being the absolutely perfect one... two 10's would imply two absolutely perfect girls at the one and same place..... It's been bothering my mind for a small while. Either that or people are really generous on the grading No offense, but shouldn't most "10"s actually be 9 maybe 9,5... missing that final little touch that'd make her perfect ? hehe... Cheers |
|
| Author: | Endorphine [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I would say that the 10's barely exist |
|
| Author: | Rye Lee [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Here's my opinion on the whole "10's" situation. there-are-no-10s-vt21599.html There are no 10's. |
|
| Author: | stunt101 [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
No such thing as a perfect 10. The way I see it is: As sexiness approaches infinity, the closer and closer the women gets to a perfect 10. They never actually reach perfection. The highest rating I give a woman is a 9.5, which only one person has ever gotten. Let's just say she even had women checking her out |
|
| Author: | Rye Lee [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: No such thing as a perfect 10. The way I see it is: As sexiness approaches infinity, the closer and closer the women gets to a perfect 10. They never actually reach perfection. The highest rating I give a woman is a 9.5, which only one person has ever gotten. Let's just say she even had women checking her out
That's basically the sum of the thread that I posted. |
|
| Author: | Jaybot [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have probably met a couple of hundred women and me and my wing have only met one ten. We got lost in Oxford and pulled over to ask a girl, when she turned around we were like holy shit she is amazing, then she started making jokes and let slip she was at Oxford uni. Hands down she is the only ten I have ever met, me and my wing looked at each other and said she was a ten. |
|
| Author: | stunt101 [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: No such thing as a perfect 10. The way I see it is: As sexiness approaches infinity, the closer and closer the women gets to a perfect 10. They never actually reach perfection. The highest rating I give a woman is a 9.5, which only one person has ever gotten. Let's just say she even had women checking her out
That's basically the sum of the thread that I posted. |
|
| Author: | The Big Bad Wolf [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
My thoughts exactly... a 10 would imply 100% perfection, which should be almost reserved for Divine beings. It just seemed they were popping up with increasing rate in all sorts of places on the forum, and it seemed a bit off, in my eyes. You can't say a woman is a 10 until you have really experienced every side of her... a 10 is a goal, a 10 is only in retrospect.... Not just "the one who got away" but the woman who you almost felt guilty being with because of her through and through perfect being. I have never seen a 10. And if someone starts thinking the woman is so perfect she must be at <i>least</i> a 10... perhaps naming her HB11.... that may be a 10. From that moment on you have something to measure women against.. A perfect snowflake, in a perfect moment, with perfect every detail... that's a 10... but ok, I see the issue has been raised, probably several times before... so I'll let it go.. I just felt a need to know others think like me, that a 10 should be the rarest of perfection... Venus or Aphrodite (I know these are the same) is the 10. |
|
| Author: | Endorphine [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It's almost like, if you picked up a 10 you'd probably drop this whole game thing and marry her because there can't be anyone hotter/better than her |
|
| Author: | Sincerelee [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I am personally trying to adapt Johny Soporno's attitude that number ratings do not matter and all that matters is whether I want her or not. I think the closest I am coming to is aspects of acceptability. For each category, I will give no points for unacceptable...1 point for tolerable...2 points for meets my desired expectations...and just for that awesomely way beyond even I could imagine, 2.2 points. I will come up with five categories. That way, it is possible to meet the fabled 11. The Catergories I have thought of right now are: Face Body Intelligence Personality Connectivity Each of these are made up of subcategories, and the whole thing is fluid so what is today's 0, could be tomorrow's 8, as my standards raise. For instance, when I first started PUA Do, my one-itis I would rate a 10, because at the time, I did not have as big of demands for intelligence. Now, she would be an 7 because although she was cute, I have seen cuter. Her body was smoking. She wasn't that bright, but my demand was that they could carry on a conversation that was not monosyllabic. In the past year, she has put on a little weight...nothing killer, just not acceptable, just tolerable. Her face has lost its cuteness due to a year of hard living...not unacceptable, but it is now tolerable. Her pesonality and our connectivity is acceptable. So she rates an HB7...1+1+1+2+2. |
|
| Author: | R.G. [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just to play devil's advocate, because everything about the rating system is obviously subjective so there's no right answer: I used to belong to the 'there's no such thing as 100% perfection' camp, until one day whilst driving in London, I was scouting the talent around the Bank area (that's an area, not a commercial bank haha), and I saw her. She was tall, long sleek brown hair, beaming blue eyes, work attire but some sort of patterned-fishnet tights. She was walking with an old businessman. She was walking a fairly brisk catwalk. But it wasn't just the fact that a glow emanated out from her. It was the fact that it was clearly visible that everyone in the vicinity had their eyes fixed on her, and she knew it, and the old man knew it, and your mum knew it, and my penis knew it. She OWNED that street. Oh, and she was smoking. If only I wasn't driving. After all, if you're not gonna give a 10 then your scale may aswell be from 1-9 |
|
| Author: | Pod [ Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
There is no real frequency of 10s. Someone you may find attractive can be pretty terrible looking to another guy. It's all about what your own taste is. |
|
| Author: | daggaz [ Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah... Im not voting on this one, how about you put some real choices (or at least the semblance of a spread) up for us to pick between? 1 in a 100? Are you shitting me? I live in a major metropolitan center of Scandinavia. This is the place where beautiful nordic godesses come from. Hell. This is the place where BLONDE comes from! And believe me, its not even close to 1 in a 100 10's. If I walk down the main tourist street I will pass at least 5000 people on a given Friday, actually I think it is even higher, the numbers they quote are almost unbelievable. And easily, NONE of them are perfect 10's. There will usually be at least one or two nines, maybe more if you look carefully, and plenty of eights. But tens? Absolutely flawless women? (and here we arent even going to go into personality and habits) Give me a break... No wonder every tom jack and harry that posts a FR here is fucking a Nine. EDIT: Heh, and I love to be the stickler, but <5 can be more, or less, than one. Since less than five can equal zero (it could equal -347), Im gonna just pick that one so I can see where this poll is going. Sorry if I skew your results, but next time also check your math. |
|
| Author: | Rye Lee [ Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well, seeing as so many people seem to be like minded, I decided to exercise my uber mod powers and add an option to the poll so that people who refused to vote because they don't believe there are 10's can now do so. I shoulda done it sooner, but I don't like to do that sort of thing, I just couldn't hold out any longer though. Sorry if you're offended Wolf, your reply made me think you'd approve. Sincerelee: you said you're trying to think like Johnny, yet you've instead developed a whole new and bizarre rating system where you're even more critical of each and every aspect of a woman. If you're trying to think like Johnny you really have to progress to a state of simply thinking, "Yeah, I'm attracted to her" or "No, I'm not attracted to her" and that's it. As an intermediate step you can use the "traffic light system" and have red = no, green = yes and yellow = undecided for when you need to wait and find out which way the scale tips. |
|
| Author: | Sincerelee [ Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yes, it is a wierd system, but it is the same idea of "am I attracted to her?", but requires a few aspects. Am I attracted to her body and face but she is dumb as a doorknob and has a bad attitude? Then, I am not attracted enough. It's five aspects that are the things I evaluate. If she has an acceptable body and face, but is incredibly smart and loves to laugh and we do good together, then I am attracted. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|