Quote:
I've on occasion went back to a guy's place on the very first date. Now, he may have been thinking chaching! sex!
But not me.
As per the thread title, we are specifically talking about clubs here. The context of the question is assuming that the hypothetical girl we're talking about doesn't have any hangups about one night stands and probably doesn't engage in self-marginalizing slut-shaming or any kind of sex-negativity.
Now, speaking to the rest of you guys:
However, it is worth considering the fact that us guys
will run into women with such sexual hangups in the club and other places when we're seeking some fast, passionate action.
Most of the time, it isn't worth the effort for us to pursue her for our intents and purposes. There are plenty of women out there who are open to a more liberated sexual experience. It's best to screen for them and pursue them, instead.
However, many times a woman may appear to be not open to such an experience and it's not that difficult to switch that around, whether it's because she actually is open to such an experience and she knows it, or she's actually open to such an experience and is in denial of it.
Just to reiterate, women who are truly not open to such an experience are NOT worth the effort of pursuing a one night stand or similar thing. Just leave them alone in nerd-town
You have to understand that slut-shaming borne from our patriarchal society pretty much forces women to pretend to be less sexual than they actually are. Hell, even plenty of women such as HT23VWY67 fell victim to
self-marginalization as a self-defense mechanism.
"Women who have sex are called sluts? Sluts are bad? I'm totally not a slut then. I'm SO not a slut that I also hate sluts! That means I'm SUPER not a slut. I'm not like THEM. See? I'm one of the cool kids!"
So, a woman will hide her true self and only be deeply sexually expressive around a man who can sympathize with this struggle and be on her side. Therefore even girls who are "DTF" will put up what we call "token resistance." That's the ritual where she has to pretend to say No so that she won't come off as "easy."
Persist past token resistance to screen for whether or not she's actually interested in a sexually liberated experience where she won't be judged for her carnal desires, and you'll open a lot of legs that otherwise would have remained closed. Let me know if any of you guys want more specifics on that.
Now, back to HT23VWY67...
HT23VWY67, I think one thing I should tell you is that very few of us guys on this site seek to be the high-value boyfriend or husband that every girl wants to marry. I'd go so far to say that a lot of us don't even want to ever get married. Instead, we seek to be that irresistible sin that you have to hide away from the rest of the prying eyes in your life - the guy you will never tell about to your father - the guy that didn't "count" - the guy who was a really great lay whenever you wanted it, but you know will never work out long term because he's on an exciting, never-ending adventure with no stability. Maybe even the guy who is just so seductive and such a great lay but he's just too short or ugly or poor or bald to tell about to your friends.
You know that quote that goes something like, "Every girl needs 4 animals in her life: a tiger in bed, a mink in the closet, a jaguar in the garage, and an ass to pay for it all?" Guys like me agree with that quote, that women (people) need different partners to fulfill different roles in her (or his) life because no one man (or woman) could possibly be so perfect that he (or she) could provide everything all at once. Here, we seek to be that tiger, and never the ass from that quote.
Based on a lot of your past posts, I think a lot of the advice you give is assuming that these guys want answers on how to be that great husband who can make your parents proud, but I really don't think that's what they're going for.