Quote:
Ok, here, at this point, I'm finally going to call bull. I'm on my 4th re-read of this thread, trying to absorb, trying to remember what I consider valuable, and for awhile I was trying to decide what to say. I re-read because I didn't want to be unfair. I really appreciate your willingness to share your perspective with people, especially at such length. But it's very clear to me from the psychological and managerial theory I've looked at, that you're a specific kind of person. "Charisma" and being "The Man" are not for everybody. You excel at treating people with kindness; kindness, however, is not the only way to communicate with, motivate, and inspire people.
I have mentioned that some of these tactics will be difficult to work with. I definitely agree that I have a special type of personality that makes some of these things work, but I also think you can use most of these within your own character.
Kindness is not the only way to communicate, motivate, or inspire a person, but it is the best way. A dictatorship works too. Stalin, Hitler, they all didn't use kindness but fear and force (which really is just fear). Now look at Manson, would you say he was good guy? Believe it or not he inspired people by making people feel good. Charisma and dictatorship are entirely the opposite, though they succeed at the same thing and that is influencing people. Note: Don't ever confuse kindness with weakness, they are not the same thing. For me it is stronger to be kind then it is to be an asshole.
Why do you think you can become a ladies man? Why can't you become good with people in general?
If you would have met me as a 22 year old manager you would know a different me. A 22 year old with arrogance who was an asshole that came from a constructions site. You know how I talked? Dominant. There wasn't please, there wasn't thank you, there was only NOW. That was my opinion of how things should be done. People work a lot harder for me now that I have learned to be a diplomat at work. You can be successful by being an asshole. To me a truly confident person doesn’t have to be an asshole, arrogance and cockiness to me is insecurity at its finest. You can motivate someone negatively, I am someone who is negatively motivated, so I agree. However, the majority of people won't work if they are pissed they will be spiteful. Wouldn't you be? Being nice and making everyone feel better will make you far more memorable, liked, and missed.
I am not reciting stuff I knew before. I am reciting stuff I have read. Go read some books on this stuff. I am not out making it up, this isn't my material.
Quote:
In your statements on Leadership you described people as either sheep, wolves, or Shepherds. You forgot the Fools. Those who will not be led, nor preyed upon, nor co-opted. The court jesters who tell the emperor he is wearing no clothes. Not you - you have plenty of clothes. But you do project a rather skewed sense of everyone going "in one direction" to better themselves. It just doesn't fit any reality or cross-section of people I've dealt with in my life. People with your orientations towards others are rare for a reason: the world is generally too painful and angst-ridden for everyone to arrive at this, with any kind of intellectual honesty. I've met people like yourself, who spend a lot of time accessing all kinds of people, who make lots of people feel good. But are you Salvador Dali? Are you Marcel Duchamp? Are you John Lennon? No, you are not. There are people who rip apart the world, who destroy it, then recreate it, who cause chaos in the social harmony and yet produce arguably "better things" in the long run because of it.
I see no difference between a fool and a sheep. A sheep is nothing but a fool. Those of you who feel different are sheep looking to distinguish yourself as differently. Perhaps it is foolish for me to consider the jesters sheep as well, but they do as the king becks and calls for, laugh, joke, and humiliate themselves for someone elses entertainment (perhaps I am a foolish sheep).
You talk about people who rip apart their own world and destroy it, not ours. Why on earth does it matter to you? Honestly, I need to understand why these people hold more value in this world then you hold yourself. How many billions do you think never hear of any of those guys? I’d bet upwards of 5 billion people don’t know who any of those guys are. How do you feel about that? They have done nothing for their world just like they have done nothing for yours, however perceive the value they gave your particular world how you’d like.
What has John Lennon created that was better? An album? I love the Beatles. Huge fan but for you to mention things in accordance with him ripping things apart and recreating it is quite the statement. He influenced the world the music, through social proof nothing more, a part of the first boy band. What about the guy who built your house? The guys who built the school you went to? The guys who built the university you are going to? One guy influences with music but I'll bet over 5 billion people have no idea who the hell Lennon is. So what world could you possibly be talking about? Who do you think influenced your life more? The guys who built those building you were educated in or a guy who sang a song? Think about that for a second. Some guy you have never met, heard of, nameless, has likely influenced Your life more than some guy who sang a song and created a “world”. Who created more of your world? The guy who painted your house or Salvador Dali?
Quote:
Why do I step up and fight you on this, when everyone else is so nice and reflective and giving back to you the mostly positive emotions you've generously offered others? Because I know there are people out there who have not found themselves, who don't know themselves, who are going to torture themselves because they don't live up to your standards of what is "the best" a person can be. What you are saying is not basically true. You have lain out a path, not the path. People who have a gut instinct that something is just not right here, should listen to it.
I am quite happy with your disagreement. I understand your points. Some people do not have the confidence to be this person. There is something I want to add. We are all this person within one of our worlds (circles). Within our friends we are this funny guy, for some of us at work we are this person with confidence. Some of us it may be video games, but we all have a world we feel confident in. A person confident in a bar won’t always be confident on a golf course. You are trying to bring that confidence, that character, that guy who is already “The Man” to be this confident you in all your worlds. For me it is effortless to be who I am. For you it is effortless to be who you are. However is it effortless to be confident in all of your “worlds”?
I agree that every person needs self-enlightenment. Getting laid won’t make you happy, I have said it before and I will repeat it again. Getting good with girls/people won’t ever make you this amazing being where your world is complete. That is horse radish. Nobody can make you happy but yourself. I will however say that you choose to be happy, you choose to be sad. You can’t convince me otherwise because this is something I have found to be true. It won’t just be true for me.
Have you ever heard the statement “if you keep doing what you already do you will get what you have already got”? Some things don’t feel right. Walking up to a girl for a lot of these girls is not gut instinct, in fact for some it goes against their gut. Do you wish them to follow? What about the guy who has the gut instinct to run away from his problems? Should he continue on his everlasting journey of running from problems? How about the guy who gets pissed off about every little thing and loses control to the point where he acts like a little kid and throws things? You seem to put things into a right or wrong for one person. Of course there are different things that will work for me that will work for you. I have managed to add all these elements to my life.
Quote:
Humanity has to embrace its Jungian Shadow to be psychologically healthy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_%28psychology%29 Some people are exceptional at it. Don't discount what does not appeal to you personally. Keep quiet on your opinions? HECK NO. Make them known. Decide for others, in the Existential sense, if they are important enough.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism Choose, and take responsibility for those choices.
You do no less when you share your opinions in such a long thread.
My opinion doesn't matter enough to me for me to care to advertise it. Why do I need to share it? If it satisfies you to do so go ahead. If you want to be known as an opinionated asshole you will choose to do so. I however am not talking about small things such as what you like or what not. I am talking politics and religion, I am a hard person to argue with so I understand. You need not accept my thoughts. I can hardly expect anyone to accept all of them, I hope that there is disagreement. I believe in individuality and not conformity.
Thanks, this is looking to be a fun conversation. Continue, I'd be very happy with a perspective change in this thread.[/quote]