| PUA Forum https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Schools of PUA https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=80180 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Herman_Munster [ Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Schools of PUA |
I'm at a crossroads, where the schools of pick up are contradicting each other. After starting with MM I've now gone to Gunwitch and 60 which has caused a lot of headaches. I mean the sexual tension thing is fine, you can't just go up to a random and say almost nothing and expect them to have sexual feelings. Shouldn't you still need kino and rapport, or at least some conversation with them? This would come off as really being weird, and if failed, would considerably dent your reputation in any social circles (if the girl told friends that knew you), if you valued that at all. I mean a girl could even press charges for sexual harassment if you use gunwitch. What are everyone's thoughts of MM compared to Gunwitch and 60? |
|
| Author: | All Day [ Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I need a Wingman anybody In the Modesto Area want to sarge |
|
| Author: | Ryan Black SashaPUA [ Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Indirect is better for Social Circle and Strippers / Hired Guns Direct is better for day game & any cold approaches |
|
| Author: | Herman_Munster [ Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Indirect is better for Social Circle and Strippers / Hired Guns
thanks that really helped, believe it or not
Direct is better for day game & any cold approaches |
|
| Author: | cerebralassassin [ Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
an alternative rather then sticking with a single method is to find out what works in different schools of thought. now being honest if something works for me ill use it and disregard what doesnt work i ve studied mm, ss, kezia noble, gambler. adam lyons and others but i only use what works what i ve learned from each. all i care about is what works i dont care about the why! |
|
| Author: | fifeguy86 [ Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | re |
im with crazy on this one! study a lot of things out a few times, if they work, keep em, if they dont, ditch them, its that simple! why follow someone elses entire model when you can take bits of everyones and create your own! tailored to suit your personality cos its WHAT WORKS FOR YOU. i have read SS, MM, 'magic bullets' -a real fave of mine actually. lots of other books too and used bits of all of them. read the game too cos Style also takes bits from all different schools. there is no reason to say this 1 certain PUA is right 100% of the time and everyone else can go fuck themselves. they all have good ideas and stuff to use that have worked great for me, most of them have stuff that doesnt work for me too. see it like a big 'pick n mix!' |
|
| Author: | daquix [ Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Schools of PUA |
Quote: I'm at a crossroads, where the schools of pick up are contradicting each other. After starting with MM I've now gone to Gunwitch and 60 which has caused a lot of headaches.
I feel the same way about 60's methods. He really does just expect you to go up to strangers, have them do all the talking, and then take them home. It makes no damn sense.
I mean the sexual tension thing is fine, you can't just go up to a random and say almost nothing and expect them to have sexual feelings. Shouldn't you still need kino and rapport, or at least some conversation with them? This would come off as really being weird, and if failed, would considerably dent your reputation in any social circles (if the girl told friends that knew you), if you valued that at all. I mean a girl could even press charges for sexual harassment if you use gunwitch. What are everyone's thoughts of MM compared to Gunwitch and 60? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|