I have a thread on direct game in this section already. Direct isn't about openers. It's about the interaction as a whole, and gearing it in an honest, up front, and unapolagetic manner from start to finish.
I'll say it again... it's not about openers. It's about making your intentions clear in a non-creepy manner, bypassing her shit tests, and not backing down or getting defensive nomatter what she says. The main strength of direct game is in the underlying attitude that you know she wants you - cos if she didn't, then she wouldn't be standing there testing you. With indirect game, you are being pleasant and appealing, and she likes you for that... so you have to look for IOI's and get her to qualify to make sure she likes you before escalating, and as I've discussed before, she doesn't always necessarily like you in *that* way so your efforts are wasted sometimes.
With direct, however, you lay your cards out right from the start . As long as she stays there talking, testing you, she is displaying some level of intrigue... and that's the only IOI you need. If she's not attracted, she will just walk off (often pretending to be a lot more offended than she actually is), and this saves you a hell of a lot of time. There's a little saying that "the more you get rejected, the more you get laid", and it is very true indeed. I'm not ashamed to say I get blown out by like 2 or 3 out of 5 girls I approach, because the ones who appreciate a pair of good old fashioned brass balls that scream "I'm a god damn animal and my intention is to eat your pussy and fuck you till you can't stand up" are really taken aback by it - and they are very, very enthusiastic about getting together. You can set up a day 2 and get to know a girl over coffee or paintballing or whatever if you like, but I much prefer to do it in the comfort of my own home (or hers).
