| PUA Forum https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Best Online Dating Sites https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=60832 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | The Grinder [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Best Online Dating Sites |
What do you think are the best online dating sites? POF is a good one. I'm about to sign up for OKcupid. eHarmony is OK, but it's not free. What are your opinions on them? |
|
| Author: | QWR324QWD [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Honestly, eharmony sucks... major balls. Unlike other dating sites, you can ONLY communicate with your matches, nobody else. Also, eharmony doesn't do a very good job at deleting inactive profiles - after about a year of inactivity I discovered my account was still getting matches. Some stats from my experience: -Maximum "matches" per day: 8 -Average matches per day: 2 -Amount of HB8+ per match: 0.1~0.2 -HB9+ per match: 0.05 -HB10 per match: about the Planck constant -Amount of inactive users per match: 0.75+ When looking at these stats keep the following in mind. -I live near a MAJOR US city, so there is no excuse for the low match quantity -When they asked me how important looks are to me I checked "very important" So if you want a website that will match you up with a mediocre amount of girls, most of which are ugly - go to eharmony. |
|
| Author: | The Grinder [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I hear ya! How can you beat free? POF and OKcupid are free, so more people join them. |
|
| Author: | Onoma [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Honestly, eharmony sucks... major balls.
Heh... I was rejected by eHarmony. Twice.
Unlike other dating sites, you can ONLY communicate with your matches, nobody else. Also, eharmony doesn't do a very good job at deleting inactive profiles - after about a year of inactivity I discovered my account was still getting matches. Some stats from my experience: -Maximum "matches" per day: 8 -Average matches per day: 2 -Amount of HB8+ per match: 0.1~0.2 -HB9+ per match: 0.05 -HB10 per match: about the Planck constant -Amount of inactive users per match: 0.75+ When looking at these stats keep the following in mind. -I live near a MAJOR US city, so there is no excuse for the low match quantity -When they asked me how important looks are to me I checked "very important" So if you want a website that will match you up with a mediocre amount of girls, most of which are ugly - go to eharmony. |
|
| Author: | The Grinder [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: Honestly, eharmony sucks... major balls.
I didn't know they could reject you. wtfUnlike other dating sites, you can ONLY communicate with your matches, nobody else. Also, eharmony doesn't do a very good job at deleting inactive profiles - after about a year of inactivity I discovered my account was still getting matches. Some stats from my experience: -Maximum "matches" per day: 8 -Average matches per day: 2 -Amount of HB8+ per match: 0.1~0.2 -HB9+ per match: 0.05 -HB10 per match: about the Planck constant -Amount of inactive users per match: 0.75+ When looking at these stats keep the following in mind. -I live near a MAJOR US city, so there is no excuse for the low match quantity -When they asked me how important looks are to me I checked "very important" So if you want a website that will match you up with a mediocre amount of girls, most of which are ugly - go to eharmony. Heh... I was rejected by eHarmony. Twice. |
|
| Author: | The Grinder [ Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: Honestly, eharmony sucks... major balls.
I didn't know they could reject you. wtfUnlike other dating sites, you can ONLY communicate with your matches, nobody else. Also, eharmony doesn't do a very good job at deleting inactive profiles - after about a year of inactivity I discovered my account was still getting matches. Some stats from my experience: -Maximum "matches" per day: 8 -Average matches per day: 2 -Amount of HB8+ per match: 0.1~0.2 -HB9+ per match: 0.05 -HB10 per match: about the Planck constant -Amount of inactive users per match: 0.75+ When looking at these stats keep the following in mind. -I live near a MAJOR US city, so there is no excuse for the low match quantity -When they asked me how important looks are to me I checked "very important" So if you want a website that will match you up with a mediocre amount of girls, most of which are ugly - go to eharmony. Heh... I was rejected by eHarmony. Twice. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|