| PUA Forum https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| Introducing: An Alternative to HBs; coining a new PU term https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=45350 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | JohnyZulu [ Mon May 18, 2009 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Introducing: An Alternative to HBs; coining a new PU term |
We all know what an HB is. She is that girl all the chumps want. She is wearing her five inch heels that make her calves and ass look great in that little black dress. She is a little catty, even though we know it’s just a bitch shield. She is so used to AFCs flocking around her for her attention that she is a little stuck up, but it’s understandable why they want to flock to her. She is, after all, a Hot Babe. Now, what about that girl who is wearing jeans and a hoodie? She hangs out with everyone but she isn’t one of the guys. Sure her sweatshirt is a little baggy but you can tell the tight body is still there underneath. Her hair isn’t all done up, it’s just in a ponytail and she’s drinking a pint just like you. She is down to earth, fun, and you find yourself enjoying her company. You didn’t notice her at first because you were busy working HBs, but there is something about this girl that you find attractive… Maybe this sounds crazy to you, but I think there is a clear difference between these types of girls. Physically they are both very attractive. But I think an HB is more than just looks, it’s the whole package. It’s the attitude, the walk, everything. Thus I find girls who are still physically attractive but don’t have all of the other characteristics of an HB to be a completely different animal. Perhaps this is of little importance to the rest of you, but I feel that these girls need their own acronym and I am wondering what your thoughts are and if you have any ideas. I find that most often when I meet a girl like this my friends will ask how my night was and I will end up describing the girl I was with not as an HB but saying that she was “Really Cute…” And thus I have settled on CG: Cute Girl, or CC: Cute Chick. Not very original, but I really feel like these girls merit differentiation from HBs. Let me know what you think gentlemen. And for the record, I have looked around for some other term, maybe one exists but I haven’t been able to find it. If you know of one that is commonly used let me know. |
|
| Author: | TheTerribleSilence [ Mon May 18, 2009 7:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I am right there with you man. I have noticed these women many times in social scenes and more often than not I find myself gravitating towards them. Their appeal is in more so in their personality and charm rather than their outward beauty, even though they are often stellar in the looks department as well. In all honestly, I would rather have an 8.5 with this type of persona than a stuck up HB10 bitch any day of the week. As for names... UC = Undercover Cutie (lame I know) WS = Welcomed Surprise Meh, If I think of anything else I will hop back on and post. |
|
| Author: | SexDrive [ Mon May 18, 2009 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sounds like a "Girl next door" (GND) type of hot to me... |
|
| Author: | Jaybot [ Mon May 18, 2009 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
how about we stop talking like we are in the army and call them cute girls, hot girls, sexy girls, girls, women whatever argh lol |
|
| Author: | Jav [ Mon May 18, 2009 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: how about we stop talking like we are in the army and call them cute girls, hot girls, sexy girls, girls, women whatever argh lol
quoted for truth.We've got enough jargon as is. |
|
| Author: | V1V [ Wed May 20, 2009 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Im tired of the fucking terminology issues. We dont need more jargon. Ok, maybe for new techinques but its just silly. |
|
| Author: | zqawsxedcrfvtbgynhuj [ Thu May 21, 2009 6:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It hardly matters... Attraction isn't based upon what class the girl fits into. HB was merely a term coined to rate that attraction on a scale. The entire idea behind it really is ridiculous. You're either attracted, or not attracted to a woman. Sure, there are varying levels in between there, like really attracted, or kind of attracted. In either case though, rating women on a "HB" scale of 1 to 10 really doesn't end up helping you in any way. Loose the term. There's a reason a lot of people ignore the entire "HB" ratings all together. We don't need them. |
|
| Author: | *olie* [ Sat May 23, 2009 9:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i dont really think it matters, rating a girl out of ten is bas enough without using "hb" or "cg" or even worse "ug" just say a number and use that "shes about a 7" will do fine |
|
| Author: | *olie* [ Sat May 23, 2009 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Im tired of the fucking terminology issues. We dont need more jargon. Ok, maybe for new techinques but its just silly.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^what he said! |
|
| Author: | madals [ Sun May 24, 2009 9:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I still think the best ever system was the binary system for women.. 1 = I would 0 = I wouldn't All the rest is simply for bragging on something that is totally subjective to the person. |
|
| Author: | Diaz [ Sun May 24, 2009 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: I still think the best ever system was the binary system for women..
couldn't agree more.
1 = I would 0 = I wouldn't All the rest is simply for bragging on something that is totally subjective to the person. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|