PUA Forum
https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/

What do you think of the accuracy of this chart?
https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=22177		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  c_n12 [ Thu May 22, 2008 12:59 am ]
Post subject:  What do you think of the accuracy of this chart?
We all obviously have different views on rating the physical attractiveness of women.

This is a HotorNot.com composite chart from Wikipedia; what does everyone think of this chart in terms of accuracy?

Image
Author:  Castnett [ Thu May 22, 2008 4:23 am ]
Post subject: 
First of all, you have to see more than a girl's face to rate her. Secondly, I think the ratings are pretty generous. Maybe it's just me...I've been told I'm a tough critic.
Author:  MattJacks [ Thu May 22, 2008 5:03 am ]
Post subject: 
i agree with castnett. you need to see more than the head. plus fromt he head i dnt recon the 9.5-10 head is that awesome. i wonder if the chick started at 0 and was photoshoped to 10 or the otherway around
Author:  David~ [ Thu May 22, 2008 6:15 am ]
Post subject: 
is it just me or does the 9.0-9.4 look better than the 9.5-10?
Author:  Mr Fahrenheit [ Thu May 22, 2008 8:01 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
is it just me or does the 9.0-9.4 look better than the 9.5-10?
Its just you, the 9.5-10 is gorgeous.. wtf is wrong with you??

^ that is an example about why this chart is garbage.. you cant rate all women on a general scale, its allll interpretation. Some men find certain things attractive that others dont.
Author:  1cane [ Thu May 22, 2008 8:14 am ]
Post subject: 
need to see the bodies to rate a girl... and also pictures dont do most girls justice they either make the girl look better or worse than in real life. Also everyone has different opinions and ratings so it doesnt matter what rating you give her someone else will see her as a different one.
Author:  Mr Fahrenheit [ Thu May 22, 2008 9:37 am ]
Post subject: 
argh, CLEARLY its not talking about the whole body. The chart is of girls faces, it is rating them in attractivness based on faces..

ie.. This face would be a 9 etc..

If it was a page full of bodies youd complain you couldnt see faces, take the chart for what it is and stop bitching.
Author:  Ezo [ Thu May 22, 2008 9:39 am ]
Post subject: 
Well, I agree, the 10 is definately not a 10! Thats a 6-7 I would say! And I wanna see the body! The 1 is not a 1 either... Thats a scale from 4-7!
Author:  c_n12 [ Thu May 22, 2008 1:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
Well, I agree, the 10 is definately not a 10! Thats a 6-7 I would say...the 1 is not a 1 either... Thats a scale from 4-7!
That's what I was thinking and I wanted to see if it was just me!

- Chris 8)
Author:  ConspiracyTheory [ Thu May 22, 2008 3:03 pm ]
Post subject: 
chart sucks, they should have used different girls who were naturally at the rating. photoshop can only do so much and although the 9.5 - 10 pic is the hottest, she's not a 9.5 - 10 IMO, maybe if she had a killer body but since we can't see that no dice.
Author:  Waffle [ Thu May 22, 2008 3:17 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sorry, but that 10 is my 7. I think that it may be accurate for the average person who isn't as shallow as me. 8)
Author:  russianbear [ Fri May 23, 2008 12:22 am ]
Post subject: 
It's all subjective, anyhow. What's more, I have found that a woman's personality does have a lot to do with how attractive I find them. For example, I have known women who, at first I was highly attracted to them. After a while, I grew tired and bored due to her lack of personality, and my opinion of them lessened. The opposite has also happened. I have known girls who I was not immediately interested in romantically. Then, after getting to know them and finding out that they are interesting, find myself thinking them more attractive.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/