in reply to the previous post, i think a lot of people could fit the equation. for example:
Jay Z, he has higher value (millionaire, famous etc) and a range of emotions.
oh, i fit it also
| PUA Forum https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/ |
|
| A=HV+E https://www.pick-up-artist-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=135&t=40225 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | revolver [ Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | A=HV+E |
I recently found an article that gives a lot of insight into natural game. RSD is, according to me, the best provider of knowledge when it comes to this area of game. http://alexattitude.com/?p=33 Enjoy! revolver |
|
| Author: | nightrider767 [ Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks Revolver, really good read. Have a cup of coffee or the "bookmark" button ready to hit, because it's long read, but well worth it. I especially liked the "Woo, Not Woo" video. Great spin on Mac/PC commercials and they nailed the point. Forget the juggling, mind reading, or set openers, you either get it, or you don't. Cheers. |
|
| Author: | jsquared [ Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That is a good post, however I'd disagree that RSD is the best company for natural game. Hands down Gambler and PUAtraining are the best. RSD is a transitional based system, they teach new students method based game first and then give them insights for transitioning. Where-as PUAtraining helps you develop yourself and build an attractive "you". |
|
| Author: | revolver [ Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Hands down Gambler and PUAtraining are the best. RSD is a transitional based system, they teach new students method based game first and then give them insights for transitioning. Where-as PUAtraining helps you develop yourself and build an attractive "you".
Before making a statement like that I would suggest that know a little bit more about RSD. One of their biggest catch-phrases is: Being, not doing.Btw, the blueprint, which is a rsd product, is filled with over 20 hours of material and none of that material has anything to do with outer game. It´s all about self-actualization. |
|
| Author: | pillow_fight [ Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
It's super long but worth reading, thanks for posting this. |
|
| Author: | jsquared [ Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm aware of that, but I also know that RSD entry level bootcamps teach a method based game similar to MM. |
|
| Author: | .Cufflink. [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Not to go off-topic but i disagree that PUATraining teach pure 'Natural Game' They are so similar to MM. Most of their books,videos and blogs are just a rip-off MM with some added stuff that isnt so important IMO. If you have ever watched The Blueprint you will understand that RSD is probably the best way of teaching someone how to become a natural. |
|
| Author: | BehindTheFog [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The alex attitude articles are a great read, and I would suggest them to anyone. One thing I noticed about that attraction formula, is how "Prince Charming" fits it perfectly. Most women have this idea of prince charming that they want in a man, and if you compare that to this formula A=HV(Prince)+E(Charming). Now you don't have to be a prince to have high value, but the charm is definitely a factor is creating a desirable range of emotions. |
|
| Author: | soup [ Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
in reply to the previous post, i think a lot of people could fit the equation. for example: Jay Z, he has higher value (millionaire, famous etc) and a range of emotions. oh, i fit it also
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|