An interesting read, I have a few questions:
Using this assumption:
Quote:
2) Most women are already naturally attracted to you
it is fair to say that what most guys do to try and get women is countering this; it is unattractive. So, if I do literally nothing at all, women are attracted to me somehow, despite people in the room being more social and displaying more value than me sat down doing nothing? Not trying to criticise and I know you're not the original author but I'm obviously missing something here - I just don't see how.
Am I taking this out of context? (unintentionally ofc)
Quote:
Resistance: who tries to diffuse the awkward moment first
If I'm in a bar talking to a girl (I initiated) and I run out of things to say, does this mean I wait for her to talk and possibly make an excuse to leave instead of carrying on talking about something else situational?
Quote:
The reduction of tension starts right away. Most guys will use a social opener or make up an excuse to start the conversation. This may help you and her both feel comfortable, but is that really such a good idea?
Is this suggesting I go direct? I would use a situational opener; I don't want to appear creepy going direct (a fault of my behalf possibly).
Quote:
Instead you want to keep relatively quiet and use more of a blank stare when listening. Similar to a poker players face. By listening intently but not giving her much feedback she will feel like she needs to qualify herself to you.
Even though I was the one who opened her? It's better to not engage as much instead of having an interactive conversation?
Despite these questions a lot of it does make sense, escalation and rapport section as well as this:"For example if you want to set up a meet it's better to call girls vs. text them. " I do that always, fuck texting.
Quote:
Risk Creepy
Skeptical...
If anyone has any examples of this "do less" I'd appreciate it. I don't understand this at all, it goes against everything I've experienced myself and that I've read in PUA.