This must be one of the most useless posts on these forums ever. What's the point of this? Why rate them in the first place? How about this scale? "I want to bang her" vs "I do not want to bang her".
Lots of people take the scale seriously... I'm not necessarily one of then but do find it useful when having a sticking point. Girls of 8-10 have are hit on all the time, get bored easily and require a different type of approach compared to a 6-7.
If you dont like it don't use it
- just thought I would share.
Look. If you use the scale, and nominate a girl a 10, you instantly reduce your chances, because in your mind, you're already placing her on a pedestal. It is also quite relative what's attractive and what's not. I'd pretty much rearrange the pictures for example, especially between the 7-9 cathegories.
I agree that hot girls get hit on all the time, but you say that you'd need a different type of game for them, than the avarage. I game every girl differently. Because basically, all of them are different. I can connect differently to them, there are different things that would make them interested. A hot ass rocker girl will most probably not be interested in me having awesome DJ skills, and the hot nerdy will definitely like that I've read some obscure, almost hipster literature, but a party queen would not give a shit about it.
Also... sometimes you think a girl is only a 6 or 7 but she's had 15 boyfriends so far and has the ego of a supermodel. It's not the appearance that will determine how I game the girl. I use the first minute of the interaction for seeking her level of ego, sexuality, confidence, bitchiness, and all other things that will be important for me to game her.
"Bros before hoes"
"It's not what you DO, it's what you ARE"
Relationship guide: extended-relationship-guide-vt170687.htmlhttp://wayoftheplayer.com/become-a-player/instinct