Often when I see someone, a PUA or a PUA to be with a strong frame, coming with a pretty good, psychological post about a method, wheter it is MM, natural style or this one or others, many people post things like "he is damn right!/ he is the shit/ true. period ,... " without thinking criticaly about it. They just take it for true.
I always love it when someone comes with an argument that goes against it, who dares to critise a method not because others say so, but because from his own rational mind, he truely believes it.
I checked the link from Chief's first post, and there was the original article from 60 years of challenge. It is also in a forum. Someone answered that the post was very good, and that he now finds himself guilty of trying to get that tension away.
A clever guy gave a pretty good answer to it. I can't say if it's the truth (actually we'll never know the truth), but it's a sharp observation.
Quote:
Quote:
I gotta admit I am pretty
>guilty of breaking tension
>often when I'm with a girl I
>like.. I have this natual C/F
>personality that just spark
>those comments I know reduce
>tension, it's like I'm on
>auto-pilot.
This isn't a bad thing DS. When you release tension, it's a break for her. An opportunity for to open herself up to feeling close to you. You're pulling her in. If you're all pull, she'll naturally push you away, but no interactions are all push or all pull.
There is a natural ebb and flow between creating tension and releasing it. It's just as important to release tension as it is to build it because it's not just the tension that draws her to you, but the pattern of building up to a point and then having a release that sucks her in. And alternating ebb and flow is just as physical and emotional as it is verbal.
Now for those of you with a critical mind, I'm interested, what do you realy think about the post of 60 years of challenge, after reading this? What do you think of this answer?