Quote:
Quote:
If it's worked for you before in a consistent manner, why change it?
Now to my criticism. You're selling an event and not demonstrating attraction. If the girl likes the idea of the event and thinks you're tolerable, you're still going to have to build from there if she takes you up on it. If you work on just being attractive, she's going to want to do something with you because of who you presented yourself to be and not the access that you can provide.
I tend to convey my attractiveness through my appearance, body language, and tone of voice. I tend to stick to the adage the less you say the better. I don't mind if the initially show up because they think I am a guy with access or degree of social status. Building attraction and sealing the deal once they are there is ironically the easiest part for me.
Make sense?
It makes sense but it isn't good screening. I personally believe if I can get a girl in my presence without a lot of distractions, I am sure I can build attraction. However, I know that the truth is that a woman's type does matter. If a girl is using you for access and you are not her type, you are wasting time unless you plan on spending a significant amount of time into seducing this girl and that's no guarantee.
I'm willing to bet that any woman that you've used this tactic on and it worked would have gone out with you regardless of the access you can provide her. However, if you like the tactic and it works consistently...why change it?